Skip to main content
Glama
pranav797

Credit Risk MCP Server

by pranav797
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Credit Risk MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Unified Server

      getfounded
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A modular server implementation for Claude AI assistants with integrated tools, enabling Claude to perform actions and access external resources like file systems, web searches, browser automation, financial data, and document generation.
      107
      MIT

    • Code Analysis MCP Server

      saiprashanths
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      The server facilitates natural language interactions for exploring and understanding codebases, providing insights into data models and system architecture using a cost-effective, simple setup with support for existing Claude Pro subscriptions.
      4
      27
      -

    • mcp-x

      LakshmiSravyaVedantham
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Turns any CLI tool or REST API into an MCP server for Claude, enabling Claude to use git, databases, or any API through natural language.
      MIT
    • genpark-agentic-lead-score-velocity-evaluator-skill by alphaparkinc

      genpark-agentic-lead-scoreofficial

      alphaparkinc
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous agents to score customer leads and evaluate interaction velocity to predict conversions, exposing deterministic, zero-dependency evaluation as an MCP tool. Integrates with MCP clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor for programmatic lead assessment.
      8
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct purpose: score_borrower (single), compare_borrowers (batch ranking), explain_prediction (local SHAP), get_feature_importance (global SHAP), and get_model_info (metadata). The descriptions explicitly contrast overlapping-sounding pairs like global feature importance vs per-borrower explanation, leaving no realistic selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_feature_importance, compare_borrowers, get_model_info, score_borrower, explain_prediction). The verbs are apt and used consistently with no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped set for a model-inference domain, with each tool earning a distinct role (score, compare, explain, global importance, metadata). Nothing is redundant or missing for the apparent purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface fully covers the inference lifecycle: single scoring, batch comparison, per-prediction explanation, global feature importance, and model metadata/limitations. As a stateless scoring service there are no CRUD gaps, and the tools form a coherent complete workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources