get_transactions_by_category

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses exclusion of pending transactions, hybrid type behavior, and exclude_fields default behavior. Lacks mention of read-only nature or authentication needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with bullet points for args. Front-loaded with purpose. Slightly verbose with full parameter description but no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers all 5 parameters with meaningful descriptions. Explains hybrid transaction output. Could mention error handling or rate limits, but output schema exists to cover return details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description thoroughly explains each parameter: category_id, plan_id, since_date, type, and exclude_fields with examples and default behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Get all transactions for a specific category' and elaborates on the return format (hybrid transactions with type field). Distinguishes from siblings by category focus.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage through parameter descriptions (e.g., type filter, exclude_fields), but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use compared to sibling tools like list_transactions or get_transactions_by_account.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.