F
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables MCP-capable coding agents to coordinate via authenticated task creation, claiming, messaging, and review approval over a secure local event log.
-
taskgate-mcp
by prachwal
Related Servers
Alternatives to taskgate-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding providers to coordinate structured multi-agent workflows with documents, tracked tasks, handoffs, and health evidence. It owns task claims, action logs, and final health results while leaving specification files on the filesystem.29 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding providers to run structured multi-agent workflows by claiming tasks, logging actions, managing handoffs, and enforcing server-side health gates across explorer, consultant, builder, and reviewer roles. Specifications stay as Markdown on disk while tracked task state, acceptance evidence, and completion checks are owned by the server.29 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables structured role-to-role handoffs and merge gating for multi-agent collaboration. It persists evidence and computes approval gates without invoking LLMs.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceShared task ledger for AI agents and humans: atomic claims, state machine, GitHub and Slack sync.6363MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGives AI coding providers a structured, provider-agnostic workflow for managing specifications, tracked tasks, handoffs, and health-gated completion evidence. Enables coordinated multi-role workflows in which tasks are claimed, logged, and verified by server-owned health checks before work is marked done.29 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 13 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Each tool targets a fairly distinct operation on the task registry, and descriptions carefully separate near-neighbors like task_claim (order-gated start) vs task_update (status+evidence) and task_move vs task_sort vs task_depends. The main friction is validation overlap: task_validate, task_render with check=true, and quality_check's built-in 'tasks' gate all validate the same registry, which could cause hesitant selection.
Naming Consistency4/5
Eleven of thirteen tools use a consistent task_<verb> snake_case pattern (task_add, task_show, task_update, task_move, task_claim, etc.). Only quality_check deviates by dropping the task_ prefix, a minor but noticeable inconsistency.
Tool Count5/5
13 tools is well within the sweet spot and each one earns its place: lifecycle (add/claim/update), querying (show/list/next), planning (move/sort/depends/profile), and verification (validate/render/quality_check). No filler tools are present.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers the full task lifecycle including dependency management, ordering, profiles, claiming, evidence-gated closure, and quality gates, plus subtasks. The notable gap is there is no delete/remove operation for tasks or dependencies beyond cancellation and clearing via task_depends, leaving a dead end for erroneous draft entries.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues