No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 16 tools
Several clusters overlap: ask vs delegate (both route work through Leanfare to a model), spend vs report vs live (three different time-window views of usage), and trial vs local_model (both run fixed question sets against models to gauge quality). The descriptions are unusually detailed and do distinguish them on close reading, but an agent skimming tool names could easily pick the wrong one for 'what did Leanfare do' or 'test a model'. The plan_* family itself is cleanly separated.
There is a coherent plan_run/plan_status/plan_stop sub-family, but the rest mixes bare verbs (estimate, ask, delegate, grade), bare nouns (models, spend, report, level, helper, live) and one compound (local_model). Names are readable and mostly intuitive, yet there is no predictable verb_noun pattern an agent could extrapolate from.
16 tools is at the upper edge, but the domain genuinely has several axes: cost estimation, delegation, plan lifecycle (4 tools), grading, observability (3 tools), model inventory (2 tools), and a level setting. Each tool maps to a real workflow step rather than padding. Slightly heavy, but defensible.
The core lifecycle is covered end to end: estimate before, delegate/ask/plan during, grade after, with spend/report/live for accounting and level/models/local_model for configuration. Minor gaps remain: there is no tool to set or adjust the budget/cap or to tick/untick models (deferred to the Leanfare app), and delegate work can be polled by id but not cancelled the way plan_stop cancels plans.