list_models
Retrieve a list of all downloaded LLM models from LM Studio to see which models are available for use.
Instructions
List all downloaded LLM models available in LM Studio
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve a list of all downloaded LLM models from LM Studio to see which models are available for use.
List all downloaded LLM models available in LM Studio
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description simply states a listing operation without details on performance, pagination, or authentication. Since operation is simple and read-only, it is adequate but not informative.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no superfluous information. Concisely states purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with no parameters or output schema, the description is complete enough. Could mention return format but not required.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so description need not add parameter information. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'all downloaded LLM models available in LM Studio', distinguishing it from sibling 'list_loaded_models' which likely lists currently loaded models.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While sibling names suggest a distinction between downloaded and loaded models, the description does not clarify usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/portertech/lm-studio-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server