Skip to main content
Glama
popechia

ABANCA MCP Server

by popechia

Related Servers

Alternatives to ABANCA MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Connects Brazilian banks (Itaú, Bradesco, Nubank, etc.) to AI agents, enabling natural language queries about expenses, statements, investments, and credit cards via regulated Open Finance.
      22
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Santander bank accounts via Open Finance Brasil to AI assistants, enabling read-only queries on balances, statements, credit card bills, and investments.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Claude, ChatGPT, and other AI agents to Caixa Econômica Federal accounts via Open Finance Brasil, enabling natural language queries about balances, transactions, credit card bills, and investments in read-only mode.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connect AI agents to real bank accounts across 15,000+ financial institutions for transactions, balances, investments, and loans.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects your Ágora bank account via Open Finance Brasil to AI agents like Claude and ChatGPT, enabling natural language queries about balances, statements, credit card bills, and investments in read-only mode.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects RecargaPay accounts to AI agents via Open Finance Brasil, enabling read-only queries about balances, statements, credit card bills, and investments in natural language.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one retrieves a list of bank accounts with balances, while the other retrieves transactions for a specific account. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functions, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool based on the need.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix, using snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations or mixed conventions, ensuring clarity and ease of use.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for a banking domain that typically involves operations like creating accounts, updating details, or initiating transfers. This limited set may hinder agents from performing comprehensive banking tasks, indicating a mismatch with the apparent scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a banking server, covering only retrieval of accounts and transactions. Missing are essential CRUD operations such as creating or updating accounts, initiating transfers, or managing payments, which are critical for typical banking workflows and will likely cause agent failures.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues