Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-sling

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the Senzii scheduling app, allowing users to manage schedules, sessions, and related data through natural language.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with UKG Pro Workforce Management APIs. It detects intent, resolves missing inputs, hydrates related objects, and returns complete, validated operational answers across scheduling, timekeeping, attendance, and more.
      1
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI clients to an enterprise resource scheduling platform so agents can view schedules and availability, track projects, bookings and allocations, manage timesheets, and run utilization, forecast and financial reports using the signed-in user's permissions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides 50+ tools for interacting with Rippling's HR platform, including employee management, payroll, time tracking, benefits, recruiting, learning, devices, groups, and custom objects, all through natural language.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., create_shift, get_timesheets, update_user), but two organization retrieval tools (get_organization, get_organization_by_id) overlap slightly, and the generic sling_api_call could be confused with specific tools. Overall, the set is well-disambiguated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_shift, get_users, update_timesheet). The only exception is sling_api_call, which still uses a noun_noun structure but is clearly named. The pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 16 tools, the count is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but still appropriate for the domain. Each tool covers a distinct function (users, shifts, timesheets, settings, etc.), and no tool feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core CRUD operations for users, shifts, timesheets, organizations, and settings, plus reporting and a generic API call. Missing delete operations and shift updates are minor gaps, but the generic API call mitigates them. Coverage is good for common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues