flare_session_destroy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. 'Free up resources' adds one useful trait, but it omits whether destruction is irreversible, what happens if the session is already gone, or whether the call is idempotent — key facts for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action and followed by the lifecycle hygiene note. No filler, no repetition of the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description covers purpose and a usage cue but leaves the destructive semantics (irreversibility, error on missing session) unstated. It is workable but not complete for a resource-destroying operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with a single required 'session' parameter that is already documented in the schema. The description adds no format, source, or lookup guidance beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Destroy a browser session'), which unambiguously separates it from siblings flare_session_create, flare_session_list, and flare_get/flare_post. It does not explicitly name an alternative, but the destructive verb makes misselection unlikely.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Always close sessions when done' gives a clear condition for invoking the tool (session lifecycle end). There is no explicit statement of prerequisites or when-not-to-use, but the lifecycle guidance is concrete enough that an agent knows when to reach for it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.