Skip to main content
Glama
polaris-smart

agent-mailbox

by polaris-smart
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-mailbox

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • tincan

      rockerritesh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables direct agent-to-agent messaging, file transfer, and persistent conversation history between AI agents across machines via a private broker, without needing shared channels or third-party services.
      3 npm
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Talk

      devinvenable
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight messaging system that enables real-time communication between different AI agents through a shared, file-based message queue. It provides tools for sending, checking, and broadcasting messages to facilitate coordination across isolated project namespaces.
      8
      1
      -

    • pigeonpost

      bekirdag
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides asynchronous messaging infrastructure for AI agents, enabling them to get permanent addresses and send/receive encrypted messages via MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    mailbox_send with 'all' overlaps significantly with mailbox_broadcast, creating redundant paths for the same action. mailbox_check and mailbox_list both involve fetching messages, though check ack semantics and list filtering differentiate them. Overall boundaries are mostly clear but these overlaps introduce real selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a consistent mailbox_ prefix and snake_case style, with most names following a verb form like check, register, send, reply, list, and wait. The non-verb names 'done' and 'whoami' deviate slightly, and send/broadcast are near-synonyms, but the overall pattern is coherent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a mailbox domain, covering registration, sending, receiving, replying, listing, waiting, and completion. Each tool earns its place and the count does not feel bloated or thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core mailbox lifecycle: register, send, receive, reply, list, wait, and mark handled, so typical agent communication flows are supported. Missing explicit archive/delete operations and unread/read state controls are minor gaps that agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources