bookstack_recycle_bin_restore

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions the action ('Restore') but does not disclose critical behavioral traits such as required permissions, whether the restoration is reversible, potential side effects (e.g., if the original location no longer exists), or error handling. This leaves significant gaps for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without any unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the core action and outcome, making it easy for an AI agent to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It covers the basic purpose and parameter context but lacks details on behavioral aspects like permissions, side effects, or return values, which are important for safe and effective tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with the parameter 'deletion_id' clearly documented. The description adds context by specifying that the deletion ID comes 'from recycle bin list,' which helps the agent understand where to obtain this value, providing meaningful semantics beyond the schema's technical definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action ('Restore') on a specific resource ('deleted item from the recycle bin') with a clear outcome ('back to its original location'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'bookstack_recycle_bin_delete_permanently' and 'bookstack_recycle_bin_list' by focusing on restoration rather than permanent deletion or listing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context by mentioning 'deleted item from the recycle bin,' suggesting it should be used after listing items in the recycle bin. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to restore vs. delete permanently) or provide any prerequisites, leaving some ambiguity for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.