sac_get_user
Retrieve details of a specific user using their SCIM user ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific user by their SCIM user ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | The SCIM user ID |
Retrieve details of a specific user using their SCIM user ID.
Get details of a specific user by their SCIM user ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | The SCIM user ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description only states 'Get details' without disclosing read-only nature, permissions, or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence of 12 words, front-loaded with action and resource, no wasted content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for simple tool, but lacks description of return values or behavior on missing user, given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema already describes userId; description merely restates it, adding no new parameter insight.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear verb 'Get details' and resource 'specific user', directly distinguishes from sibling tools like sac_list_users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as sac_list_users; lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pmankineni/mcp-sac-tools'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server