get_marketplace_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It adds useful behavioral context by noting that the template includes env var requirements, aiding in resolving secrets and choosing project flow. However, it doesn't disclose potential errors, permissions, or confirm read-only behavior beyond the verb 'Get'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is just two sentences, both of which provide essential information—what the tool does and when to use it. No fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get operation with an output schema, the description is mostly complete. It states the purpose, the key output detail (env var requirements), and the usage context. It doesn't mention error behavior, but the output schema likely covers return structure. The main gap is no explicit parameter semantics, though the parameter name mitigates that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not directly explain the parameter format. However, the parameter name 'template_id_or_slug' is self-explanatory, and the description's mention of 'one marketplace template' implies the parameter identifies which template. The description adds minimal semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'one marketplace template', which distinguishes it from the sibling tools for listing all templates or deploying them. However, it does not explicitly mention the alternative tools by name, only implying the singular nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit 'when to use' guidance: 'Use this before template deployment'. This is clear context, though it doesn't mention when not to use or name alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.