plugandship-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to plugandship-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLets MCP clients such as Claude, Cursor, VS Code and Codex search a hand-checked directory of MCP servers, AI plugins and agent tools, returning summaries, copy-paste install configs and setup guides. Also supports keyword and category browsing plus troubleshooting guide lookups, working offline from a bundled snapshot when needed.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSearch and inspect 50,000+ Agent Skills (SKILL.md) for Claude Code, Codex and other agents, with trending, curated picks, author lookup and pinned install metadata. Read-only. The server lives in the repo's mcp/ folder, which is open source under MIT (mcp/LICENSE), and is published to npm as omgskills-mcp.5-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that searches 3,800+ open-source AI agents by capability, ranked by real traction (stars, activity). Query it from Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, or Windsurf.349 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables natural-language search of 378 curated AI agent frameworks, developer tools, and automation repositories from inside Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any MCP-compatible client, returning matching repos with descriptions instead of manual GitHub browsing. Also exposes category listing, stats, and single-repo lookup.-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search a directory of 13,870+ MCP servers, 4,384+ agent skills, and plugins from Remote OpenClaw, returning install commands directly.349 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching and retrieving details of 41,000+ agent skills, MCP servers, Claude Code plugins, and agentic loops from any MCP-capable agent.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a distinct role: list_best surfaces curated topic rankings, search_tools queries the index, get_tool fetches one slug's detail, and trending ranks new items by star velocity. The only mild overlap is between list_best and trending, both being ranked lists, but their framing (topic vs recency) keeps them separable.
Three tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (list_best, search_tools, get_tool). trending breaks the pattern with a bare gerund/noun, a minor deviation but not confusing.
Four tools is on the lean side but fits a compact directory/index API where search plus detail plus two curated views is the core surface. Nothing feels redundant or dead-weight.
The lifecycle of discover (search_tools/list_best/trending) and inspect (get_tool) is covered, and list_best with no topic effectively enumerates topics. Minor gaps exist, such as tag/language filtering or explicit topic enumeration, but the core workflow is intact.