Edit a video from a written brief by deploying a multi-agent swarm. Provide the brief and optional style, duration, or search index to orchestrate automated video production.
Run the multi-agent swarm to edit a video from a brief.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| brief | Yes | ||
| style | No | ||
| index_dir | No | ||
| max_iterations | No | ||
| target_duration | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The description only restates the purpose without revealing any side effects, duration, project mutation, or dependencies. An agent cannot infer whether this tool modifies the current project, requires a loaded project, or returns a rendered output.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it is under-specified rather than efficiently informative. It lacks structure, front-loading of critical information, and contains no additional useful details beyond the bare purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With 5 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is grossly incomplete. It does not explain parameter formats, expected input types, return values, side effects, or how this tool integrates with the rest of the workflow. An agent would be unable to call this tool correctly without additional information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters, but it mentions none. It does not describe 'brief', 'style', 'index_dir', 'max_iterations', or 'target_duration'. The only hint is 'from a brief' which loosely relates to the required 'brief' parameter, but no semantics are provided for any parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb 'Run' and resource 'multi-agent swarm', with a clear purpose 'to edit a video from a brief'. It distinguishes from low-level editing tools like trim or add_clip, but it does not explicitly differentiate from other high-level tools such as build_narrative or assemble_from_plan, which could also be used for video creation from a brief. Still, the purpose is clear enough to convey the core function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus its many siblings. It implies a brief is required ('from a brief') but does not state prerequisites, exclusions, or alternatives. There is no indication of when this should be preferred over tools like assemble_from_plan or make_short.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.