Skip to main content
Glama
pks0204

Odoo Developer Assistant MCP

by pks0204

Related Servers

Alternatives to Odoo Developer Assistant MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables safe, local DevOps inspection through a JSON-lines server with schema validation, path isolation, and redaction, supporting read-only Git operations, Kubernetes YAML validation, Terraform plan summaries, and sanitized log analysis.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local code inspection and analysis for clean code practices, best practices, and actionable recommendations without external API calls or modifying the code.
      39 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to run static analysis on GitHub repositories, raw code snippets, or local directories to detect cloud cost leaks in Terraform/AWS configs, PostgreSQL migration table-lock hazards, and OWASP/Next.js API security gaps. Each finding returns structured severity, line-level detail, and drop-in fixes.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The per-file analyzers (XML, Python, security) are clearly distinct, but inspect_odoo_module, validate_odoo_manifest, and check_odoo_addon_health all take the same addon_path argument and examine manifest/dependency concerns, with health subsuming the other two. An agent must read descriptions carefully to choose between inspect vs validate vs the full health audit.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a predictable verb_odoo_noun snake_case pattern (analyze_*, inspect_*, validate_*, check_*, verify_*) and uses 'odoo' as the consistent domain token. No mixed conventions or casing irregularities.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well within the sweet spot and each maps to a distinct artifact type or workflow stage (manifest, XML, Python, security, error, aggregate audit, live verification). Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers static analysis across the major addon artifact types plus an aggregate health audit and live XML-RPC verification, which is strong lifecycle coverage for a developer assistant. Gaps remain: no scaffolding/module creation, no JS/OWL asset analysis, no automated fix application, and no i18n or test-related checks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues