Skip to main content
Glama
pkolawa

KRS Poland MCP Server

by pkolawa

Related Servers

Alternatives to KRS Poland MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables looking up Polish companies by NIP, REGON, or KRS number to retrieve their registered name, legal address, and entity type from Statistics Poland's official register.
      62 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Polish company register (KRS) via the official Ministry of Justice API — entities, boards and shareholders with verifiable citations.
      3
      48 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to Poland's largest business registry database, enabling company search, beneficiary checks, and financial document retrieval via natural language.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for verifying Polish business entities from the National Court Register (KRS) and VAT White List. Allows querying by KRS, NIP, or REGON to retrieve official company data including name, address, board, and capital.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying the Polish KNF e-RUP payment institution registry, including entity search, details, services, agents, branches, and history.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides clean, typed access to the Polish REGON business register (GUS BIR1), enabling AI assistants to look up companies by NIP, REGON, or KRS and retrieve structured data like name, address, and legal form.
      6
      31 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Both tools retrieve KRS records, and their names ('Current' vs 'Full') are unclear in differentiation. Descriptions do not explain what additional data 'Full' provides, leading to potential confusion for an agent.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Both tools use 'Get_' prefix with PascalCase, which is consistent. However, the second word ('Current' vs 'Full') is somewhat arbitrary and not part of a clear pattern (e.g., Get_Current vs Get_Full).

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is very narrowly scoped. This can be appropriate if the sole purpose is retrieving two variants of a record, but it feels thin for a typical MCP server.

    Completeness2/5

    Only retrieval operations are provided, lacking search, creation, or updates. If the domain requires any interaction beyond fetching records, the tool surface is severely incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues