Motion MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Motion MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural-language management of Motion tasks, projects, workspaces, schedules, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, statuses, and users via the Motion API.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceBridges Motion's API with LLMs via MCP, enabling natural language management of tasks, projects, schedules, and more.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language management of Motion tasks, projects, schedules, and more via the Model Context Protocol, integrating with LLMs like Claude and ChatGPT.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Motion tasks, projects, workspaces, schedules, comments, custom fields, and recurring tasks through natural-language conversation via the Model Context Protocol.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language management of Motion tasks, projects, schedules, and more by bridging the Motion API with LLMs through the Model Context Protocol.10Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM clients to manage tasks, projects, workspaces, schedules, comments, custom fields, recurring tasks, and statuses through natural conversation by bridging Motion's API via the Model Context Protocol.10Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool is named after a distinct Motion resource, and the descriptions clarify intent. The main ambiguity is between motion_tasks and motion_recurring_tasks, since recurring tasks are a subset of tasks, and motion_custom_fields includes task/project association operations that could be mistaken for task or project edits.
All tools follow a consistent motion_<resource> snake_case naming pattern, making the API surface predictable. motion_search is the only non-plural-resource name, but it still fits naturally within the prefix convention.
Ten tools cover the main Motion API domains without redundancy or bloat. This is a well-scoped count for a server managing tasks, projects, workspaces, users, and related settings.
Tasks have strong CRUD coverage, but projects only support create/list/get with no update or delete, and recurring tasks lack update operations. These lifecycle gaps create dead ends for agents, and comments lack explicit operation detail in the description.