Indiana Code
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Indiana Codewhat does Indiana Code 9-21-5-5 say?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Indiana Code
Indiana Code by citation, plus full-text topic search and historical (per-year) annual editions. Keyless.
Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1704+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.
Source (fleet #2724)
The Indiana General Assembly's code viewer (iga.in.gov) is a React SPA. Its own
JS bundle names its data source directly (REACT_APP_API_URL), and the page a
title renders fetches one plain document per title per year:
https://iga.in.gov/ic/<year>/Title_<N>.htmlOne document per TITLE, not per section — Title_9.html (Motor Vehicles) is
~5.9 MB and contains all of Title 9's ~2,300 sections for that year. <year>
is the same field the SPA calls in_code_year — this is the historical-
version capability: in_code_section's year argument fetches the exact
same shape for a past year (e.g. 2018), rather than needing a separate archive
API. Measured 2026-10-06: Title 9 has real content back to 2017; some titles'
earliest year differs, so a request for a year with no archived content
returns year_or_title_not_found rather than a hardcoded floor.
The upstream needs a browser-shaped User-Agent. A bare UA (including a
plain "Mozilla/5.0") gets HTTP 200 with a 691-byte SPA shell — silent
emptiness, not an error. Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; pipeworx-mcp-indiana-code/1.0; +https://pipeworx.io) — the same honest bot-UA convention this repo already
uses elsewhere (19hz, fed-comms) — passes; no Referer, cookie, or JS challenge
needed. Confirmed with a plain curl, outside any browser.
Related MCP server: Indian Legal MCP
Citation lookup
in_code_section resolves a citation (e.g. "9-21-5-5", "32-31-3-6") by
locating its boundary marker — a section-classed element keyed by the
citation itself — in the title document. Every title/article/chapter/section
in the source carries the same marker shape, so one boundary scan finds a
section's exact start and end regardless of its depth in the hierarchy.
For the current code, it tries a pre-fetched bundle first
(scripts/ingest-indiana-statutes.mjs, written to the shared pipeworx-datasets
R2 bucket at statutes/in/<title>.json — one bundle per title, 37 total) and
falls back to a live fetch if the bundle is missing. For an explicit year
different from the bundle's own ingested year, it always goes live — the
pre-fetched bundle only ever holds the current code; historical years are not
pre-ingested because the live path is not throttled (unlike
mcps/north-carolina-code's per-section path on ncleg.gov).
Each section's trailing "As added by..."/"Amended by..." note (and any
"[Pre-<year> Recodification Citation: ...]" line) is split out into its own
history field rather than left inside text — the amendment-history
capability the task asked for, same split mcps/california-code makes for its
own trailing enactment parenthetical.
Topic search
in_code_search answers questions no citation lookup can — "landlord
retaliatory eviction", "oversized vehicle permit" — via FTS5 in the shared
SEARCH_SHARD Durable Object (workers/gateway/src/search-shard.ts, shard
name in-statutes; no new Cloudflare binding, per
docs/gateway-text-binding-limit.md). Search hits carry a citation and
heading; call in_code_section with the section from a result for the full
text.
Coverage
All 37 Indiana Code titles that exist as separate documents (Title 7 is fully folded into 7.1 and returns no separate content; Titles 17/18/19 are "REPEALED" stubs with a marker and zero sections — both kept as real, zero-section results rather than treated as missing). 77,780 sections ingested across 37 titles for the 2026 code.
Refresh
node scripts/ingest-indiana-statutes.mjs — re-run periodically (the General
Assembly convenes annually; there is no daily-freshness need). No schedule is
wired up: dispatch by hand, following the same pattern as
scripts/ingest-nc-statutes.mjs.
Data source
Official state legislature site (iga.in.gov). Indiana statutes are public record; no reuse restriction was found on the title bulk-document paths used here.
Quick Start
Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):
{
"mcpServers": {
"indiana-code": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/indiana-code/mcp"
}
}
}What this endpoint actually serves
tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/indiana-code/mcp returns the tools in the table
above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx,
discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the
gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a
single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the
pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and
is the authoritative answer for a given day.
This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a
scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via
ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a
second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without
them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth,
connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.
Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pipeworx": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
}
}
}Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1704+ data sources. The
only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx
reaches all of them from either one.
No MCP client? Call it over HTTP
curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/in_code_section \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"section":"9-21-5-5"}'No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/in_code_section. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.
Standalone (no gateway account)
This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:
{
"mcpServers": {
"indiana-code": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-indiana-code"]
}
}
}Or run it directly to confirm it starts:
npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-indiana-codeIt speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call
for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway
connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.
Using with ask_pipeworx
Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:
ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Indiana Code data" })The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.
More
License
MIT
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Search US and Indian statutes, regulations, constitutions, and court rules.
Structured access to 10 major Indian legal texts (BNS, IPC, etc) for AI agents.
Resolve, search and verify legal citations against the official sources, with provenance.
Search U.S. case law, fetch opinions, and ask matter-aware legal questions over your documents.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to 529,000+ US statute sections across all 50 states and federal codes for comprehensive legal research. Supports semantic search, citation graph traversal, jurisdictional comparisons, and regulatory risk analysis through natural language queries.67 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to retrieve the exact, structured text of 10 major Indian Acts — pulling individual sections or Constitution articles, browsing chapters and section ranges, and running ranked keyword searches — with repealed laws flagged and their replacements named. All results are sourced directly from the underlying Act texts rather than model memory, preventing hallucinated section numbers, punishments, or outdated law.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to retrieve Michigan Compiled Laws statutes by citation from the official state source without requiring an API key.408 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables retrieval of West Virginia Code statutes by citation from the official state legislature data, supporting both direct tool calls and natural-language queries.401 npmMIT