Skip to main content
Glama

get_styles

Retrieve all design styles from your current Figma document to access colors, typography, and effects for consistent implementation.

Instructions

Get all styles from the current Figma document

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • This is the handler function for the 'get_styles' MCP tool. It sends a 'get_styles' command to the Figma plugin through the WebSocket connection using sendCommandToFigma and returns the result as a text content block. If an error occurs, it returns an error message.
    server.tool(
      "get_styles",
      "Get all styles from the current Figma document",
      {},
      async () => {
        try {
          const result = await sendCommandToFigma("get_styles");
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: JSON.stringify(result)
              }
            ]
          };
        } catch (error) {
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: `Error getting styles: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)
                  }`,
              },
            ],
          };
        }
      }
    );
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states a read operation ('Get') but lacks details on permissions, rate limits, response format, or whether it returns all styles at once or paginated. This is inadequate for a tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose without unnecessary words. It earns its place by clearly stating what the tool does, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (0 parameters, no output schema), the description is minimal but incomplete. It lacks behavioral context (e.g., response format, error handling) and usage guidelines, which are crucial for an agent to invoke it correctly. With no annotations or output schema, more detail is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so there are no parameters to document. The description doesn't need to compensate for any gaps, making it sufficient in this dimension. A baseline of 4 is appropriate as no parameter information is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and resource ('all styles from the current Figma document'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_annotations' or 'get_document_info', which also retrieve document metadata but focus on different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., requires an open document), exclusions, or compare it to siblings like 'get_local_components' or 'get_document_info', leaving the agent to infer usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pipethedev/Talk-to-Figma-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server