spij-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to spij-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching and reading Peru's Official Gazette for norms, resolutions, booklets, and PDFs through a local MCP harness. It provides full-text search with date and booklet filters, plus retrieval of document summaries, integral text, and public PDF URLs.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRemote MCP server that provides access to over 285K Argentine court rulings and user's own case files via Streamable HTTP transport.-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that provides access to Argentine legal documents (legislation, CSJN jurisprudence, international treaties) with verifiable provenance including SHA256 hashes and source URLs, enabling legal professionals to search and verify citations.13-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for accessing Uruguay's IMPO open data API with SQLite caching. Provides tools to retrieve legal norms, search regulations, and access schema documentation from Uruguay's official legal database.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Peruvian government data, enabling search and anomaly detection in public procurement (OSCE) and legislative tracking (Congress), plus semantic search over both domains.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects AI to the Chilean legislation system (Ley Chile) for retrieving legal norms, citations, and intertemporal analysis.282MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Buscar_normas and buscar_jurisprudencia are clearly split by domain, and estructura_norma versus buscar_en_norma serve distinct navigation purposes. However, detalle_norma and texto_completo heavily overlap: both retrieve text by id with offset/max_chars/desde_final, and the agent may hesitate which to use for a given document.
All names use consistent snake_case and Spanish, which is readable. But the pattern mixes verb-first (listar_filtros, buscar_normas, buscar_jurisprudencia) with noun-first (estructura_norma, detalle_norma, texto_completo) and a prepositional form (buscar_en_norma), so there is no single predictable convention.
Seven tools is well within the ideal 3–15 range for a read-only legal search server. Each tool has a distinct role (filter discovery, two search domains, outline, within-document search, retrieval), and none appears superfluous.
The read-only lifecycle is largely covered: filter discovery, norm and jurisprudence search, document structure, within-document search, and text retrieval via metadata or full-text routes. Minor gaps include no explicit batch retrieval or dedicated jurisprudence metadata tool, but the existing tools offer workarounds.