Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to juris-sedetc-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching and reading Peru's National Systematized Jurisprudence from the Judiciary's public portal, including resolutions and arbitration award records, with full-text and exact-catalog filtering plus paginated results. Users can retrieve complete summaries, public PDF URLs, and complete Excel exports of a search without any authentication or browser.
      10
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching Polish Constitutional Tribunal judgments and rulings (with facet filters and sorting) and fetching the full HTML text of a given judgment directly from trybunal.gov.pl, without authentication.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local MCP clients to search and read Peru's official legal information system, including legal norms and jurisprudence, with tools for full-text search, structure mapping, targeted reading, and filters. It provides clean content without storing files, using stdio transport and public session authentication.
      7
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching Brazilian court jurisprudence directly in official sources (STF, STJ, TNU, TRF1–6, Turmas Recursais, TRUs, and BNP/CNJ qualified precedents), returning literal ementas, panel, rapporteur, dates, and full-text links. It works as an MCP server for Claude Code and Claude Desktop as well as a command-line tool, with parallel multi-court queries and source diagnostics.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The three retrieval tools overlap heavily: buscar_sentencias, busqueda_avanzada and resultados_sistematizacion all query the same two TC inventories with text/keyword filters, so an agent must read long prose to decide which to call. The descriptions do provide explicit disambiguation hints (text-only vs. multi-filter vs. concept id, and cross-references between tools), which keeps it usable but not clean. listar_tesauro/listar_sistematizaciones/listar_filtros are clearly distinct, so only the search cluster is ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case Spanish, and clear families emerge: listar_* for catalog/tree navigation (4 tools) and resultados_* for filtered result sets (2 tools). Minor deviations exist — buscar_sentencias (verb) vs. busqueda_avanzada (noun) vs. detalle_sentencia (noun) — but the pattern is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a jurisprudence search server with two inventories, two concept trees (tesauro and sistematizacion), a keyword catalog and a filter catalog. Each tool has a clear job and none feels like filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full read-only lifecycle: discovery (filtros, palabras, sistematizaciones, tesauro trees), search (full-text and multi-filter), and full-record retrieval via slug with PDF URL. Minor gaps: no way to fetch or page through PDF/binary content, and the heavy overlap between the three search tools suggests the surface could be consolidated rather than extended.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues