Buscando por orden de publicación

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. 'Búsqueda puntual' weakly implies a read-only exact lookup, but it says nothing about error/not-found behavior, permissions, or the response shape — significant gaps for a tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short lines, front-loaded with the purpose before the arg detail, with no wasted prose. The 'Args:' block is slightly awkward but not bloated.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description should hint at what a successful lookup yields and what happens when the OP is not found. It covers the input format adequately but leaves the return value and failure mode entirely unspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the parameter is nothing but 'type: string, title: Op'. The description compensates well by specifying the required format 'NNNNNNN-N' and giving a concrete example ('2558398-1'), which is exactly the information an agent needs and that the schema lacks.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb+resource: an exact ('puntual') lookup by publication order number (OP). However, it never says what the search returns (a device? a publication record?) or how it relates to the sibling tools like buscar_dispositivos and obtener_dispositivo, so the agent cannot fully tell it apart from its neighbors.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The word 'puntual' implies an exact-match lookup rather than a bulk listing, but there is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of when to prefer buscar_dispositivos or the obtener_* siblings instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.