Skip to main content
Glama
pintar-team

simple-notify-mcp

by pintar-team
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to simple-notify-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Telegram MCP Server

      bonzhigh
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send messages to Telegram users via a Model Context Protocol server, with support for chat IDs, usernames, and a web-based configuration interface.
      1
      -

    • Kokoro TTS MCP Server

      giannisanni
      A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides text-to-speech capabilities through the Model Context Protocol, allowing applications to easily integrate speech synthesis with customizable voices, adjustable speech speed, and cross-platform audio playback support.
      1
      10
      MIT

    • CastleCall MCP

      ctf2009
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes a text-to-speech announcement tool for the CastleCall home PA system on Raspberry Pi. It enables users to broadcast voice messages using local Piper or cloud-based ElevenLabs providers through the Model Context Protocol.
      -

    • Rime MCP

      MatthewDailey
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI models to generate and play high-quality text-to-speech audio through your device's native audio system using Rime's voice synthesis API.
      1
      71 npm
      27
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools serve entirely different purposes: one provides runtime status information, the other performs speech output. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functionality.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Both tools use underscored names, but one follows a noun-based pattern ('simple_notify_status') while the other uses a verb (‘tts_say’). The prefixes also differ, making the naming pattern inconsistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a 'notification' domain. While the tools cover basic status display and text-to-speech, more tools (e.g., configuration, provider management) would be expected.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers status checking and speech output, but lacks tools for configuring providers, managing queues, or handling errors. The domain is narrowly scoped, so the gaps are notable but not severe.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources