Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pinoox-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for syntx.ai AI platform that enables chat, image generation, model catalog, and account management through any MCP-compatible assistant.
      28
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides intelligent access to Perplexity AI's search and reasoning models with automatic model selection, conversation management, and project-aware storage. Supports real-time search, deep research, chat sessions, and async operations for complex queries.
      16 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for WordPress content management via REST API, supporting posts, pages, media, comments, and terms through natural language interfaces like Cursor, ChatGPT, Codex, and Claude.
      11 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A robust, lightweight Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed to empower your AI Agents with context-awareness, safe execution sandboxes, and dedicated thought logs.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing secure tools for filesystem operations, Git management, web search, document conversion, npm/.NET project management, and AI generative capabilities (image/video/audio generation and processing) via PiAPI.ai integration.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the Pinoox ecosystem (e.g., db_schema for migrations, list_models for models, read_log_entries for logs). There is no ambiguity; even similar tools like project_info and read_app_manifest have clear scope differences.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_apps, read_log_entries, search_docs). The naming is predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 20 tools covering configuration, dependencies, routing, models, migrations, logs, documentation, and CLI commands, the count is well-scoped for a framework-specific server. It covers essential inspection tasks without being bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is thorough for read-only inspection of a Pinoox project, covering most common development needs. Minor gaps exist (no tool for writing or modifying project files), but these seem intentional given the server's focus on read-only operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues