Skip to main content
Glama
pinnintisagarSB

ServiceNow Dev MCP

by pinnintisagarSB
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to ServiceNow Dev MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ServiceNow MCP Server

      shameerampcome
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to interact with ServiceNow instances to manage incidents, service catalogs, workflows, and knowledge bases through the ServiceNow API. It supports comprehensive operations including record querying, script execution, and user management using various authentication methods.
      66
      MIT

    • ServiceNow MCP Server

      JLKmach
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to interact with ServiceNow instances through comprehensive API integration. Supports incident management, service catalog operations, change requests, knowledge base management, user administration, and agile project management with multiple authentication methods.
      82
      MIT

    • ServiceNow MCP Server

      javerthl
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to interact with ServiceNow instances through the ServiceNow API. Supports comprehensive ServiceNow operations including incident management, service catalog management, change requests, user management, and workflow automation through natural language.
      82
      MIT

    • ServiceNow MCP Server

      swesmith-repos
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to interact with ServiceNow instances for incident management, service catalog operations, change requests, knowledge base management, user administration, and agile project workflows through various authentication methods.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 125 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a specific resource and action, with clear phase prefixes (e.g., analyze_, build_, create_). Even within dense areas like migration, tools like discover_schema, build_artifacts, and run_full_migration are distinct. The platform prefixes (jira_, sf_, sn_) further separate concerns.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case. Platform-specific tools are uniformly prefixed (jira_, sf_, sn_). Variations like test_code_file or map_users still adhere to the same structure. No mixing of camelCase or inconsistent verb forms.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 125 tools, the set is very large. While it covers a broad scope across multiple platforms (Jira, Salesforce, ServiceNow) and many functional areas (migration, testing, integration, code generation), the sheer number may overwhelm agents and increase selection complexity. Slight trimming or grouping could improve usability.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive, covering migration lifecycle, testing, integration, code review, and administration. Minor gaps exist: e.g., no direct tool for updating catalog items (only clone), and deletion tools are limited (e.g., no generic delete for most entities). Overall, core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources