Skip to main content
Glama
piligrim-code

Unified Memory MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Unified Memory MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and any MCP-compatible client to persist, search, update, and delete plain-text memories across sessions, using BM25 lexical ranking over SQLite FTS5 with namespace filtering, tags, free-form metadata, and JSONL export/import — entirely local, with zero external infrastructure.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLM applications and agents to persist and recall scoped memories in a local SQLite store, with semantic/hybrid/metadata search, review-first corrections and summaries, and controlled export, backup, and purge operations over stdio.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents and other MCP clients to read and write the same durable facts in a local SQLite memory, searched by embedding plus full text and separated into global and per-repository scopes, with a browser notebook and ZIP backup/migration. Runs over stdio or HTTP, keeping search on-machine and secrets redacted before storage.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a drop-in MCP memory server over stdio using a local SQLite store, enabling agents to store, search, and audit memory with provenance, scoped access, and contradiction tracking without requiring API keys, LLMs, or embedding providers.
      345 npm
      16
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to store and recall durable facts, decisions, and lessons over MCP using hybrid semantic and keyword search, typed memories, graph relations, sessions, and time-travel queries. Runs locally with no server process or API key, persisting everything to files that both agents and a CLI can share.
      14 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but memory_search and memory_recall overlap as search mechanisms, and memory_bootstrap overlaps with handoff_load/handoff_list by also returning handoff data. Descriptions help clarify preferred usage, so misselection is unlikely for careful agents.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case with a predictable domain prefix: memory_ or handoff_. Actions are generally verbs and the pattern is stable across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but each tool serves a distinct role in memory management or handoff lifecycle. The set is rich but not bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers memory CRUD, search, recall, admin tasks, and handoff lifecycle, so core workflows are complete. Minor gaps include no direct handoff_get by id, though handoff_load/list and memory_prune cover most needs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues