Skip to main content
Glama
piiiico

proof-of-commitment

by piiiico
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to proof-of-commitment

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • EVIDIQ Lineage by evidiq

      EVIDIQ Lineageofficial

      evidiq
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Deterministic supply-chain provenance, SBOM/AI-BOM generation, and dependency risk analysis for npm and PyPI packages, with 14 security rules and verifiable reports.
      1
      MIT

    • ossfind

      Aniket-kr1030
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables safety-ranked discovery of open-source components across npm, PyPI, crates.io, RubyGems, GitHub, and Hugging Face, with license, security, and health checks.
      1,348 npm
      MIT

    • pkgtruth

      hxckya
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents and CI to vet npm dependencies before they reach the lockfile, flagging hallucinated, slopsquatted, or otherwise risky packages with evidence-backed verdicts.
      3
      68 npm
      4
      MIT

    • brandguard

      Baneado98
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Scans npm, PyPI, and GitHub for typosquatting and brand impersonation, risk-scores findings, and drafts takedown notices.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct entity type (business, GitHub repo, Go module, npm package, PyPI package, domain) or a distinct operation (batch audit). No two tools have overlapping purposes; even the two business lookup tools are differentiated by search method (name vs. org number).

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools use 'lookup_' prefix, but 'audit_dependencies' and 'query_commitment' break the pattern. Additionally, 'lookup_business' and 'lookup_business_by_org' have differing suffixes, though still consistent. The mix of verbs (lookup, audit, query) is a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server covers the essential entity types (business, GitHub, Go, npm, PyPI, domain) plus a batch audit function, without unnecessary bloat. This count is well-scoped for the domain of commitment verification across multiple ecosystems.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main package ecosystems (npm, PyPI, Go) and GitHub repos, but lacks other popular ecosystems like Ruby gems or Cargo crates. Businesses are limited to Norway only. A minor gap given the stated focus on 'commitment profiles' for common supply chain vectors.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources