Skip to main content
Glama
pietrodileo

IRIS MCP Blueprint

by pietrodileo

Related Servers

Alternatives to IRIS MCP Blueprint

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with InterSystems IRIS databases through SQL queries, document management, ObjectScript execution, debugging, and unit testing via the Atelier REST API.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Cross-platform MCP server for SQL Server that enables AI assistants to explore schemas, relationships, and run read-only queries via natural language.
      1
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges AI assistants with SQL databases, enabling natural language querying across multiple database types with built-in optimization and security.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Inductive Automation Ignition, enabling AI assistants to browse and write tags, query history and alarms, manage projects, and deploy Perspective views through natural language.
      43
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, covering production management, database operations, globals, web apps, and code search. A few pairs like check_global/check_global_content and fetch_data/export_table could cause confusion, but descriptions help differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming conventions are mixed: some use verb_noun (add_production_item), others verb_object (describe_table), and some verb_phrase (import_csv_to_iris). While readable, there is no consistent pattern like verb_noun throughout, which reduces predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 26 tools, the server covers a broad domain (production, database, globals, web apps, code). While slightly high, each tool serves a distinct purpose within the scope, making the count acceptable.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers production lifecycle, database queries, and global management well, but lacks explicit table creation (only via import), update/delete rows, and table deletion. These gaps can hinder typical CRUD workflows and require workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues