IRIS MCP Blueprint
Related Servers
Alternatives to IRIS MCP Blueprint
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with InterSystems IRIS databases through SQL queries, document management, ObjectScript execution, debugging, and unit testing via the Atelier REST API.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCross-platform MCP server for SQL Server that enables AI assistants to explore schemas, relationships, and run read-only queries via natural language.1MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that bridges AI assistants with SQL databases, enabling natural language querying across multiple database types with built-in optimization and security.3-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Inductive Automation Ignition, enabling AI assistants to browse and write tags, query history and alarms, manage projects, and deploy Perspective views through natural language.431MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA single MCP server that exposes safe, permission-checked tools for AI assistants to reach file systems, databases, APIs, Git, cloud services, and business applications.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with IBM i AS/400 source members for source code management, compilation, and development workflows.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, covering production management, database operations, globals, web apps, and code search. A few pairs like check_global/check_global_content and fetch_data/export_table could cause confusion, but descriptions help differentiate them.
Naming conventions are mixed: some use verb_noun (add_production_item), others verb_object (describe_table), and some verb_phrase (import_csv_to_iris). While readable, there is no consistent pattern like verb_noun throughout, which reduces predictability.
With 26 tools, the server covers a broad domain (production, database, globals, web apps, code). While slightly high, each tool serves a distinct purpose within the scope, making the count acceptable.
The tool set covers production lifecycle, database queries, and global management well, but lacks explicit table creation (only via import), update/delete rows, and table deletion. These gaps can hinder typical CRUD workflows and require workarounds.