Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Redis MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive Redis database operations supporting all major data types (strings, lists, sets, hashes, sorted sets) with full CRUD functionality through natural language commands.
      9
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage and search data in Redis using natural language. Supports hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, streams, JSON, and vector search.
      44
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI to safely view and operate Redis databases with read-only mode by default and support for key operations.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to safely explore and operate Redis instances, with read-only keyspace inspection, multi-structure data access, memory and big-key analysis, slow query diagnostics, and optional opt-in write operations.
      4
      232 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with and manage multiple database types (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, SQL Server, MongoDB, Redis) through natural language, supporting query analysis, schema management, data analysis, backup/restore, and security analysis.
      3 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides access to Redis databases. This server enables LLMs to interact with Redis key-value stores through a set of standardized tools.
      93 npm
      30
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 34 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity, as they are organized by Redis data types (hash, list, set, string, zset) and operations (get, set, delete, etc.), plus connection and backup utilities. The naming explicitly indicates the target resource and action, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as hash_get, list_lpush, string_set, and backup_create. All tools use snake_case with no deviations, making the naming predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 34 tools, the count is borderline high for a Redis server, as it includes comprehensive coverage of data types and operations but may feel heavy compared to typical MCP servers (usually 3-15 tools). However, it is reasonable given Redis's feature-rich nature.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for Redis operations, including connection management, data manipulation for all major types (hash, list, set, string, zset), key operations, and backup/restore. There are no obvious gaps, ensuring agents can handle full workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues