Skip to main content
Glama
phy-zhangzl

Literature Evidence MCP

by phy-zhangzl
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Literature Evidence MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • terminal_kb

      xuj1nfan
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local agents to search and retrieve cited evidence from PDFs and Markdown notes, including page-specific passages and rendered page images.
      6
      GPL 3.0

    • TheGenie

      ehsanghorbani190
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI writing assistants to retrieve citable evidence from local PDFs and verify draft citations against their sources locally, providing verifiable support for claims.
      2
      2
      MIT

    • Paper Reader MCP

      oylx666
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-first analysis of research papers and slide decks by converting local PDFs, DOCX, PPT, and PPTX files into a cached, token-efficient index for batched searching and selective visual verification.
      4
      2
      -

    • Keepygaga RAG

      TimWongUp
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local-first hybrid knowledge retrieval from authorized Markdown and plain-text files, combining full-text and vector search with reranking and traceable source references via a single search tool.
      1
      MIT

    • BorgesHoard

      Luissalet
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables assistants to search a personal library of local documents using hybrid BM25 and embeddings, retrieve exact passages with file and page citations, and manage collections entirely on the user's own machine.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct function: health/status, file enumeration, search across metadata and full text, targeted excerpt retrieval, and visual page inspection. The only close pair, fetch and read_page_image, is clearly differentiated as text versus image access.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are consistently lowercase snake_case but mix conventions: list_files and read_page_image follow verb_noun, while library_status is noun_noun and search/fetch are bare verbs. The set remains readable but does not follow one predictable naming pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is appropriately sized for a literature retrieval server; each covers a distinct need without redundancy. The count is well within the ideal 3-15 range and feels neither sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core evidence workflow: locate sources via search/list, retrieve text via fetch, and inspect visual content via read_page_image. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated full-metadata display or comparison tool, but these are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources