mcp-agrus-ai
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-agrus-ai
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects AI hosts to a deterministic, cited regulatory-compliance reference so agents can look up laws, search regulations, compute which requirements a product triggers, and find related Controls, vendors, enforcement actions, and counsel with primary-source links. It also exposes the accepted feature/market/audience catalog and a token verifier for grounding what was served.40 npmMIT
GateCoreofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover governed capabilities, inspect machine-readable contracts, and request policy-checked procurements with signed receipts and audit trails.Apache 2.0
CDOP MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search projects, retrieve and validate CDOP documents, explain schemas, list enums, and inspect state machines over Streamable HTTP, returning HAL links so agents can continue navigating the API.MIT- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the SCF Controls Platform for security compliance, including browsing controls, tracking implementation, managing evidence, assessing risks, and monitoring vendors via natural language.26622 npm3MIT
- FlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the ComplianceCow platform to retrieve compliance insights, dashboard data, and auditable evidence through a Compliance Graph. It also supports automated remediation actions such as fixing policies and creating tickets in external tools.10013-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to connect securely over Streamable HTTP/SSE or a local stdio bridge to specialized digital administrative colleagues for tasks such as business-card scanning, prospecting, encrypted file management, approval queues, learning memory, and agent status, while preserving human-in-the-loop control and EU data sovereignty.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct outputs (list vs. quote vs. proposal vs. compliance vs. case study). The main overlap is between request_quote and scope_poc, since both return a heuristic price band before commitment, but the descriptions explicitly differentiate exploratory pricing from a drafted Discovery Sprint scope. list_services also touches pricing tiers, adding slight redundancy with the quote tools.
Names follow a mostly predictable verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_services, list_verticals, request_quote, request_proposal, query_compliance_position, get_case_study). scope_poc is the one deviation, where the verb-noun structure is less clean, but the style remains readable and consistent overall.
Seven tools is well-scoped for an informational and lead-generation surface. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct question or action, with no filler or duplicate tools.
The surface covers the buyer journey well: services, verticals, compliance posture, proof (case studies), pricing exploration, formal proposal, and a scoping artifact. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct contact/location info or tier-comparison tooling, but these are largely embedded in list_services and can be worked around.