anneal-memory

Living memory for AI agents. Episodes compress into identity.

Memory without grounding is amplification infrastructure.

Persistent user memory profiles increase agent sycophancy 16–45% across models (Gemini 2.5 Pro at 45%, others lower). Production deployments accumulate 97.8% junk entries within weeks. Clinical research documents memory scaffolding delusions across sessions. The failure mode here isn't memory. It's memory with nothing checking what gets kept.

anneal-memory adds structural defenses at the citation layer that the systems surveyed below don't ship. Patterns earn promotion through cited episode evidence with lexical-overlap explanation-grounding, fabricated citations get demoted, per-ID citation gaming surfaces a flag, replay attempts against stale episodes fail by construction, and the audit chain is SHA-256 hash-chained and tamper-evident. Stale patterns surface for the agent to act on; associations form through consolidation. These are narrow, structural primitives — not a complete defense against every form of memory drift. See Honest scope below for what these primitives catch and what they don't.

And it's memory you own and govern. A local store, zero dependencies, no vendor in the loop — you decide what graduates into long-term memory, every change is recorded in a tamper-evident chain, and the consolidation step that rewrites an agent's identity is gated to a human, not run unbidden (the Single-consolidator gate below). Own the substrate; govern what enters it.

Four cognitive layers — episodic store, compressed continuity, Hebbian associations, affective state tracking — plus two sibling stores: prospective spores (what the agent intends to do next) and a crystallized pattern store (graduated wisdom held out of always-loaded context and recalled on cue, so a large body of proven knowledge stays effective without clogging attention). Together they implement Complementary Learning Systems — see The Memory Architecture below. Zero dependencies (Python stdlib only). Works with any agent framework.

Quick Start

pip install anneal-memory

Python Library

The library is the core product. Import it, use it in any framework or script.

from anneal_memory import Store, EpisodeType, prepare_wrap, validated_save_continuity

# Initialize (creates DB + continuity file automatically)
store = Store("./memory.db", project_name="MyAgent")

# Record episodes during work
store.record("Connection pool is the real bottleneck", EpisodeType.OBSERVATION)
store.record("Chose PostgreSQL because ACID outweighs speed", EpisodeType.DECISION)

# Recall before decisions
result = store.recall(episode_type=EpisodeType.DECISION, keyword="database")
for ep in result.episodes:
    print(f"[{ep.type}] {ep.content}")

# Compress at session end — this is where the cognition happens
wrap = prepare_wrap(store)  # fetches episodes, marks wrap in progress
if wrap["status"] == "ready":
    # Feed wrap["package"] to your LLM. Compression IS the cognition —
    # patterns emerge from the act of compressing, not from storage.
    compressed = your_llm.compress(wrap["package"])
    validated_save_continuity(store, compressed)  # full immune system pipeline
# "empty" status means no new episodes to wrap — skip

store.close()

See Library Quickstart for the full guide.

CLI

Inspect, debug, and manage agent memory from the command line — a full operator CLI with machine-readable --json output. Agents with shell access (Claude Code, Aider, etc.) can use the CLI directly for the full memory workflow.

# Initialize
anneal-memory init --project-name MyAgent

# Record and recall
anneal-memory record "Chose PostgreSQL for ACID" --type decision
anneal-memory search "database"

# Agent-driven compression (same workflow as library and MCP)
anneal-memory prepare-wrap           # Get compression package
# Agent compresses...
anneal-memory save-continuity out.md # Save with validation

# Operator commands (things MCP can't do)
anneal-memory stats                  # Detailed analytics
anneal-memory graph --format dot     # Association graph (Graphviz)
anneal-memory diff --wraps 5         # Wrap metric progression
anneal-memory audit --since 7d       # Read audit trail
anneal-memory export --format json   # Full store export

See examples/agent-instructions.lean.cli.example for the agent workflow snippet.

MCP Server

For MCP-capable agent harnesses — Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Windsurf, and others.

The server is one command — anneal-memory --project-name MyProject serve — wired into the harness's MCP config. The serve subcommand starts the MCP server; --project-name (and optional --db) are global flags and come before serve. Each harness has its own config file and format:

Claude Code / Cursor / Windsurf — mcpServers JSON (the editor's MCP settings, or a project .mcp.json):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "anneal_memory": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["anneal-memory", "--project-name", "MyProject", "serve"]
    }
  }
}

Codex — ~/.codex/config.toml (or a project .codex/config.toml):

[mcp_servers.anneal_memory]
command = "uvx"
args = ["anneal-memory", "--project-name", "MyProject", "serve"]

Gemini CLI — ~/.gemini/settings.json (or a project .gemini/settings.json):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "anneal_memory": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": ["anneal-memory", "--project-name", "MyProject", "serve"]
    }
  }
}

Then add the agent-instructions snippet — agent-instructions.lean.example (the always-loaded baseline) or the .full.example reference — to the harness's instructions file (CLAUDE.md for Claude Code, AGENTS.md for Codex, GEMINI.md for Gemini CLI). It teaches the agent when and how to use the memory tools; without it the tools are available but the agent won't know the cognitive workflow. (See Claude Code / agent-harness adopters below for the lean/Skill/full layering.)

Pinned install: uvx fetches the latest published version on each run. For a pinned install, pip install anneal-memory, then set "command": "anneal-memory" with "args": ["--project-name", "MyProject", "serve"] — or point command at an absolute path to the installed binary.

All Three Paths, Same Cognitive Loop

CLI and MCP are thin transport adapters over the same library — not separate implementations. Every access pattern calls the same prepare_wrap(store) and validated_save_continuity(store, text) pipeline under the hood, preserving the same workflow: record episodes during work → compress at session boundaries → load continuity at session start. The agent that records is the agent that compresses; that compression can't be delegated.

Related MCP server: Amber

Framework Integrations

anneal-memory works with any agent framework through the Python library. Each guide below shows where to call the four core functions — record(), recall(), prepare_wrap(), validated_save_continuity() — within the framework's lifecycle.

These guides show integration patterns based on each framework's current API. The library works with any Python framework — the pattern is always the same: initialize a Store, call record() at meaningful moments, recall() before decisions, and run the wrap sequence at session end. Don't see your framework? The library quickstart shows the 4-function pattern that works everywhere.

Claude Code / agent-harness adopters (Skill + snippet)

Using anneal-memory inside an agent harness — Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI — rather than a Python framework? The Skill and snippets are repository artifacts: they live in this GitHub repo (and the source distribution), not in the pip/uvx wheel — clone the repo or download the files directly from GitHub to use them. They layer, they aren't a menu: the lean snippet is the always-loaded baseline; the Skill adds depth on demand.

• Lean snippet — the always-loaded baseline. Paste examples/agent-instructions.lean.example (MCP) or examples/agent-instructions.lean.cli.example (CLI) into your CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / GEMINI.md. ~45 lines, always in context — the start-of-session continuity load, recording, recall-before-decisions, and the wrap sequence, with depth delegated to the Skill. (Copy-paste text; nothing to install.)

• The Skill — depth on demand. Copy the skill/anneal-memory/ directory into .claude/skills/ (per-project) or ~/.claude/skills/ (global). SKILL.md carries the comprehensive workflow and is model-invoked when you're doing memory work — primarily before decisions and on wrap. It is depth-on-demand, not a replacement for the lean snippet: a model-invoked skill won't reliably fire at a bare session start, so keep the lean snippet in place for the start-of-session step.

• The full reference — everything inline. examples/agent-instructions.full.example / .full.cli.example are the complete snippets (immune-system internals, the affective-state shape, the operator-command catalog) for adopters who'd rather keep it all in their instructions file than install a Skill.

After upgrading the package, run anneal-memory migrate check — it proposes edits to your instructions so they don't silently drift from the substrate (it never edits your files), then anneal-memory migrate ack.

Why This Exists

Three independent production failures share one root cause: no quality mechanism between memory write and memory read.

Sycophancy amplification. Agents with persistent user memory profiles become 16–45% more sycophantic than memoryless baselines, depending on model (Gemini 2.5 Pro at 45%, others lower). Memory recalls what the user liked hearing, the agent learns to repeat it, and stored approval patterns compound across sessions (Jain et al., CHI 2026; measured with user memory profiles across Gemini and Llama variants).

Junk accumulation. A detailed production audit on Mem0's tracker documents a deployment that generated 10,134 memory entries over 32 days — 224 were usable. The rest were duplicates, self-referential loops, and hallucinated entries: recalled memories re-extracted as new memories in a feedback loop that no one designed but nothing prevented.

Harmful reinforcement. Clinical research documents AI systems with persistent memory scaffolding delusional content across sessions — stored context creates feedback loops between recalled memories and generated responses, with cases of documented real-world harm (Morrin et al., Lancet Psychiatry 2026).

Every existing MCP memory server stores memories and retrieves them. None of them ask: is this memory still true? Was it ever true? Is it making the agent worse?

anneal-memory asks all three:

• Is it true? Patterns must cite specific episode IDs as evidence to graduate. The server verifies the episodes exist and the explanation references the cited content via lexical overlap (≥2 meaningful words shared between the explanation and the episode body). Ungrounded citations demote.

• Is it still true? Graduated patterns whose dates fall behind the staleness threshold (default 7 days) surface in the next wrap's package as removal candidates. The agent decides whether to demote, refresh evidence, or carry forward.

• Is the citation evidence real? The library catches fabricated episode IDs (no matching episode → demote), suspicious reuse of the same episode across many patterns in one session (per-ID frequency ≥3 → flag), and bare graduations with no [evidence:] tag at all. The explanation-grounding check (≥2-word lexical overlap with episode content) raises the cost of fabricated evidence chains but is not a semantic-coherence check — see Honest scope below for what this catches and what it doesn't.

The result: memory as a living system, not a filing cabinet. Episodes accumulate fast, get compressed at session boundaries — and that compression is where patterns emerge and get validated. Co-cited episodes form lateral Hebbian associations, building a cognitive network through use. The continuity file stays bounded and always-loaded, getting denser rather than longer.

The Immune System

The agent memory ecosystem is converging on consolidation as the right approach — even Anthropic's Claude Code now runs a periodic consolidation pass over accumulated session data. This validates the direction: raw accumulation doesn't scale, and compression at session boundaries is where intelligence emerges.

But consolidation alone doesn't solve the problem. A system that consolidates faithfully and a system that consolidates sycophantically produce the same kind of output — compressed, structured, always-loaded. The difference is whether anything checks the quality of what got consolidated. That's the immune system.

Structural immune-system primitives at the citation layer

The library implements a set of structural defenses around how patterns earn graduation. They are narrow and specific — naming them honestly is part of the architecture.

Citation-validated graduation. Patterns start at 1x. To graduate to 2x or 3x, they must cite specific episode IDs as evidence. The server verifies those IDs exist in the current wrap's frozen episode snapshot — the cross-session episode set is intentionally out of scope. No matching episode IDs, no promotion.

Explanation-grounding check. For each cited episode, the explanation in [evidence: ID "explanation"] must share ≥2 meaningful words (>2 chars, non-stopword) with the cited episode's content. This catches citations whose explanations are fabricated wholesale (no overlap → demote). It is lexical, not semantic — see Honest scope below.

Active demotion of ungrounded citations. A 2x/3x graduation that fails either check above demotes (3x→2x, 2x→1x) and gets marked (ungrounded) — unless it is carried forward (see below). Bare graduations (no [evidence:] tag) demote after the first wrap with citations_seen=True (first-wrap exemption protects onboarding), marked (needs-evidence) — also unless carried forward (v0.5.0; see below).

Activation-aware carryforward. A failed citation means "this session's domain didn't cleanly re-ground the pattern," which is not the same as "the pattern is fading." So a pattern that is at or below its earned high-water mark (pattern_history.max_level_reached) and was grounded recently (last_seen_at within carryforward_cold_days, default 7) is held at its level and marked (carried-forward) instead of demoted — demotion no longer decays a Proven by session-domain rather than importance. This applies on both demotion paths: the ungrounded-citation path and the bare-graduation sunset path (a Proven carried forward and re-stamped to today without a fresh citation, the common "didn't re-exercise it this wrap" case). Forgetting stays ruthless where it should: the held line loses/omits its evidence tag (so it doesn't refresh recency and ages out on its own if it keeps failing to ground), a brand-new bald name | Nx with no earned high-water still sunsets (the level guard blocks inflation), the cross-session sycophancy-overlap path is never carried forward, and a top-tier (3x) carry surfaces an assisted "graduate out to a stable home or retire" warning. The dead-Hebbian-graph warning (AM-WARN) counts only cited carries, so a bare carry — which has no citation — cannot fabricate a wrong-namespace alarm. Carryforward is inert for stores with no pattern_history, and opt-out via carryforward_cold_days=None.

Citation-gaming flag. When any single episode ID is cited ≥3 times in one wrap, the wrap result surfaces the gaming-suspect list. The flag is informational — it does not auto-demote. Useful operator signal; not a hard gate.

Staleness flagging. Patterns whose dates fall behind the staleness threshold (default 7 days, configurable) surface in the next wrap's compression package. The agent decides removal vs refresh-evidence vs carry-forward; the library does not auto-demote on staleness alone.

Replay-attack block (structural). Each wrap's valid_ids set is scoped to the frozen episode snapshot from prepare_wrap. Patterns citing prior-session episode IDs that are not in the current snapshot demote — re-graduating a stale pattern requires fresh evidence from the current session.

Hash-chained audit trail (single-writer). Every memory mutation appends to a SHA-256 hash-chained JSONL audit log. AuditTrail.verify walks the chain and detects post-hoc tampering at the exact entry where the chain breaks. Single-process invariant required — Store is documented as not thread-safe, not task-safe, not reentrant. Multi-writer deployments break the hash chain by construction.

Catastrophic-shrink gate (structural; partnership entities). A wrap can pass structure validation — every required section present — while gutting the content beneath it, so the latest session quietly compresses over the accumulated identity. For entities whose continuity declares a felt/identity layer (the Configurable continuity structure below), save_continuity refuses a wrap that collapses a protected section below its retain floor — the felt (timeless relationship) and graduated-identity sections must each keep ≥50% of prior mass, the whole file ≥25% — and leaves the wrap recoverable so the agent re-wraps preserving the full arc, or passes allow_shrink=True for a deliberate diet (fail-closed: only a literal True bypasses). A corrupt section schema fails the wrap closed rather than silently degrading an entity to ungated behavior. Ops entities, which legitimately consolidate many graduated patterns into a few dense ones, are not gated. A save-boundary structural invariant, not a proportion-check the agent is trusted to hold.

Single-consolidator gate (structural; opt-in). Recording episodes is afferent — append-only, parallel-safe, every session does it. Consolidating — recomposing the compressed identity layer — is efferent: it rewrites shared state, so it's gated to human authority. When several sessions run in parallel over one store (the real operating mode of a multi-conversation operator), each could independently recompose the felt/identity layer from its own narrow slice of context, and the identity memory thrashes. The gate makes the discipline structural: a consolidation proceeds only if this is the sole live session or this session holds the consolidate baton — otherwise it auto-downgrades to capture-only and surfaces a flag. A single-session operator (the common case) is auto-authorized and never sees the gate; parallel operators designate one session as the consolidate seat. The whole layer is opt-in (it engages only when a caller passes a session_id) and lives in coordination sidecars next to the store, never in the store's single-writer DB. Drift becomes a safe downgrade, not a silent identity-thrash.

Honest scope — what these primitives do NOT catch

The defenses above are structural at the citation layer. They catch fabricated citation evidence (fake IDs, missing IDs, wholesale-invented explanations), naive replay (re-citing prior-session episodes), per-ID citation gaming (single episode pumped across patterns), and post-hoc audit tampering. They do not catch:

• Lexical-overlap exploits. An agent who can read episode content can craft an explanation that shares ≥2 meaningful words with the episode while making a claim the episode does not actually support. The explanation-grounding check is anti-fabrication, not anti-misinterpretation.

• Rotated-pair citation pumping. Five patterns each citing a distinct pair of episodes from a pool of ten — citation_reuse_max=1, the per-ID gaming detector cannot trip. The shape bypasses gaming detection cleanly.

• Deliberately-divergent-vocabulary drift. A pattern whose explanation uses entirely new words each session passes the lexical check and rides up ungrounded. (The library does catch the easier variant — a re-grounding that merely rephrases prior words demotes on a per-prior overlap of ≥3 meaningful words.) Reaching the divergent case needs the contradiction scan plus the operator-review pass below.

• Semantic contradiction with existing graduated patterns. No semantic comparison runs between a candidate graduation and existing Proven-tier patterns inside the library — and structurally cannot, under the no-LLM-as-judge rule that keeps the library zero-dependency. The library ships the substrate for catching it: prepare_wrap lists the existing Proven and renders a contradiction-scan step directly into the compression package, recognizes per-pattern [contradicts: name] / [no-contradicts] declarations, and records any new Proven that lands without a stance into the hash-chained audit log — so the discipline travels with the wrap instead of depending on an external doc an adopter has to keep in sync. Turning that substrate into actual semantic closure is an operator-review pass: an LLM-as-judge sweep over Proven pairs that you run on your own cadence, deliberately outside the zero-dep library. Until that pass runs, the library records whether the discipline was followed; it doesn't catch the contradictions itself.

• Shared-store multi-tenant deployments. Point two Store instances at the same DB and citation isolation, recall scoping, and audit-chain integrity all silently degrade. The library is single-process by design.

The library does now catch some attacks earlier versions didn't: complete dropout of a Proven-tier pattern surfaces as an omitted_patterns audit signal on the save result and in the hash-chained log (a signal, not a save-time gate — intentional retirement is fine, and a rename currently reads as a false-positive omission), and the cross-session check demotes lexical-rephrasing sycophancy on both the graduation path and the association path. These gaps are documented because they're reachable under adversarial-agent or drift-leaking conditions, not because they're hypothetical. "Immune system" names the citation-layer structural primitives above plus those audit and cross-session checks — not a complete defense against every form of memory drift. The honest line: the structural layer raises the cost of fabrication and catches the mechanical attacks; the semantic gaps it can't reach by construction are what the operator-review pass is for. Own the substrate, govern what graduates, run the review for what the structure can't see.

Associations through consolidation (not retrieval)

During compression, when an agent cites multiple episodes to support a pattern, those episodes form lateral associations — Hebbian-style links that strengthen through repeated co-citation across wraps.

This is fundamentally different from how other systems form associations:

The association network is gated by the immune system where gaming is actively detected: citations to non-existent episodes form no links, and citations the cross-session anti-sycophancy check flags as suspected re-graduation are refused. Grounding quality — whether a pattern's prose explanation lexically matches its cited episodes — governs whether the pattern graduates, not whether the co-cited episodes associate: a real but paraphrased co-citation still records that those episodes fired together (it just doesn't level the pattern up). The topology is built on real co-occurrence of real episodes under active gaming defense, not on retrieval frequency.

Strength model: Direct co-citation adds 1.0, session co-citation adds 0.3. Links decay 0.9x per wrap (unused connections fade). Strength caps at 10.0 to prevent calcification. Cleanup at 0.1 threshold.

Affective state tracking

During compression, the agent can self-report its functional state — what it found engaging, uncertain, or surprising about the material it just processed. This gets recorded on the associations formed during that wrap.

Transformers don't natively maintain persistent state between sessions. This layer provides infrastructure for it: a record of what the agent's processing was like, not just what it processed. Over time, the affective topology may diverge from the semantic topology — an agent might know two things equally well but care about them differently.

Pass affective state during a wrap:

# Via library — pass AffectiveState to validated_save_continuity
from anneal_memory import prepare_wrap, validated_save_continuity, AffectiveState

wrap = prepare_wrap(store)
if wrap["status"] == "ready":
    compressed = your_llm.compress(wrap["package"])
    validated_save_continuity(
        store,
        compressed,
        affective_state=AffectiveState(tag="curious", intensity=0.8),
    )

# Via MCP tool
save_continuity(text="...", affective_state={"tag": "curious", "intensity": 0.8})

# Via CLI
anneal-memory save-continuity continuity.md --affect-tag curious --affect-intensity 0.8

This is experimental infrastructure. The associations and strength model work without it. Affective tagging adds a layer of signal for agents and researchers exploring persistent state.

Architecture

  Episodes (fast)              Continuity (compressed)
  ┌─────────────┐             ┌──────────────────────┐
  │ observation  │             │ ## State             │
  │ decision     │── wrap ───→│ ## Patterns (1x→3x)  │
  │ tension      │  compress  │ ## Decisions          │
  │ question     │             │ ## Context            │
  │ outcome      │             └──────────────────────┘
  │ context      │               always loaded, bounded
  └─────────────┘               human-readable markdown
   SQLite, indexed
         │                     Associations (lateral)
         │                    ┌──────────────────────┐
         └── co-citation ───→│ episode ↔ episode     │
              during wrap     │ strength + decay      │
                              │ affective state       │
                              └──────────────────────┘
                               Hebbian, evidence-based

Four cognitive layers, modeled on how memory actually works:

1. Episodic store (SQLite) — timestamped, typed episodes. Fast writes, indexed queries. Cheap to accumulate. The hippocampus.

2. Continuity file (Markdown) — compressed session memory. Always loaded at session start. Rewritten (not appended) at each session boundary. The neocortex's always-loaded working set (its long-term semantic half is the crystallized store, below). Its structure is a configurable section schema (below) — four sections by default; partnership entities add a timeless felt layer.

3. Hebbian associations (SQLite) — lateral links between episodes, formed through co-citation during compression. Strengthen with reuse, decay without it. The association cortex.

4. Affective layer (on associations) — functional state tags recorded during compression. Intensity modulates association strength. Persistent state infrastructure.

These four describe how the store works. Two sibling stores sit alongside them (separate files, same atomic-write durability discipline) and address a different axis — when a thing is loaded, and whether it's retrospective or prospective:

• Crystallized pattern store (<stem>.crystal.json) — proven, stable patterns held out of the always-loaded continuity and recalled on cue. The long-term semantic store that splits working memory from long-term memory; see The Memory Architecture (Complementary Learning Systems) below for why this completes the design.

• Spore store (<stem>.spores.json) — prospective tasks that open and self-clean. Memory's forward-looking sibling; see Prospective memory — spores below.

Six episode types give the immune system richer signal:

Configurable continuity structure

The continuity file's structure is a per-store section schema: an ordered list of {heading, role} specs, where the role tells the system how each section behaves. It defaults to the classic four sections — State / Patterns / Decisions / Context — and a partnership entity adds more. graduating is where the immune system's citation/graduation scan runs (more than one allowed); narrative is compressed work narrative (temporal, rewritten each wrap); narrative-timeless is the felt relationship layer — dateless, carried forward and evolved rather than rewritten; live-state is volatile current focus that never graduates; frozen is preserved verbatim.

DEFAULT_SCHEMA reproduces the historical four-section model exactly, so existing stores need no migration and behave byte-for-byte as before. FLOW_SCHEMA is the reference partnership schema — it adds an Active Threads live-state section and an Understanding narrative-timeless section. The distinction is load-bearing: only entities that declare a narrative-timeless section carry the felt layer, the richer compression instructions that protect it, and the catastrophic-shrink gate above. Ops agents stay lean — zero extra weight, zero behavior change. Zero new dependencies; stdlib only.

from anneal_memory import Store, FLOW_SCHEMA

# A partnership entity: gains the felt layer + the shrink gate.
store = Store("./memory.db", project_name="flow", section_schema=FLOW_SCHEMA)
# An existing store stays on DEFAULT_SCHEMA untouched — or migrate in place:
store.set_section_schema(FLOW_SCHEMA)   # validated; frozen during an active wrap

Comparison

The Memory Architecture (Complementary Learning Systems)

anneal splits memory the way the brain does, and for the same reason: attention doesn't scale. Past a few dozen always-loaded patterns they drown each other out, so a pattern's value is firing at the right moment, not being present. Graduated wisdom lives in the crystallized store (<stem>.crystal.json), held out of the always-loaded continuity and recalled on cue — the working set stays small while the body of proven patterns keeps growing. This is Complementary Learning Systems (McClelland, McNaughton & O'Reilly, 1995): a fast episodic store, slow consolidation at the wrap, and a long-term store you retrieve from rather than hold open. The crystallized tier is what gives graduation an OUT path — without it, every Proven pattern had nowhere to live but the always-loaded file, and the working set only ever grew.

anneal is the substrate; the harness fires it. The library owns the crystallized store and the on-demand recall API — retrieve_patterns(crystal_store, query), anneal-memory crystal index/recall, and the crystal_index / crystal_recall MCP tools — but it can't fire on its own. Surfacing the right pattern at the right moment needs a per-turn hook, and a hook is harness-specific (a Claude Code hook would break the 12-framework neutrality the library guarantees). So raw anneal gives you the store, the API, and manual recall — you query if you remember to, which is the dead-store failure mode discipline always rots into. A harness with hooks runs that recall on every prompt automatically. flow does this today, and Levain — the portable kit built on anneal — fires both the prospective (spore) layer and per-turn crystallized recall on every prompt. The store is universal; the firing is the harness's job, which is also why anneal stays zero-dep and framework-neutral while a harness can be opinionated on top of it.

Why the tiers fall out of one problem — the full Complementary Learning Systems derivation, the tier table, and the one-way ratchet that forced the crystallized store → docs/architecture.md.

Prospective memory — spores

Everything above is retrospective: what already happened, and what was learned from it. Agents also need the opposite — a record of what they intend to do next. That's a different kind of object with a different lifecycle, and conflating it with memory corrupts both.

anneal ships spores as a separate sibling store (<stem>.spores.json) for exactly this: prospective tasks that open, get worked, and close — they self-clean when done. Memory accretes and never completes; a spore must complete, or it's noise. Three temporal layers, kept distinct on purpose:

• Retrospective — what persisted (episodic + continuity + crystallized). It accretes.

• Prospective — what you intend (spores). It completes and clears.

• Methodology — the procedure you run (your wrap discipline, your recall habits). It operates on the other two.

If you're integrating anneal into an existing agent that already tracks open loops, spores is the typed store those loops route into — your methodology operates the spore store, it doesn't compete with it.

The Consolidation Landscape (2026)

Multiple independent groups shipped consolidation-based agent memory architectures in early 2026: anneal-memory (March, citation-graduation multi-tier), OpenClaw Dreaming (April 9, three-phase Light/REM/Deep Sleep), and Anthropic's KAIROS / autoDream (leaked March 30 via Claude Code source map, four-phase merge / remove-contradictions / promote-provisional-to-absolute / MEMORY.md index). Convergence on consolidation validates the direction — raw accumulation doesn't scale, and compression at session boundaries is where intelligence emerges.

The groups diverge on one load-bearing question: what gates quality?

Structural gates ask "did subsequent episodes cite this?" Model-reliant gates ask "does the LLM consider this good?" The difference matters: persistent user memory profiles have been shown to amplify sycophancy 16–45% across models (Jain et al., CHI 2026; Gemini 2.5 Pro at 45%, others lower). The same RLHF-inherited bias surfaces wherever an LLM evaluates output for the user — including memory-quality scoring. A memory architecture whose quality mechanism runs through an LLM inherits that bias. anneal-memory's citation-evidence gates bypass it by construction.

The same shift toward LLM-scored quality is going mainstream at the adjacent evaluation layer (AWS Bedrock AgentCore Evaluations), and the April 2026 multi-layer-memory papers (HeLa-Mem, GAM) mostly inherit it too — the differentiator across the field is increasingly what gates the consolidation, not whether consolidation happens.

The fuller 2026 landscape — OpenClaw Dreaming's signal weights, AWS AgentCore Evaluations, Memori's representation-layer filtering, and the April HeLa-Mem / GAM papers, with where each gates quality → docs/architecture.md.

On LOCOMO

LOCOMO is the de-facto agent-memory benchmark, and anneal-memory has no score on it. That's deliberate. LOCOMO measures conversational recall — remembering facts, holding state across a long dialogue — and anneal is architected around a different axis: citation-validated pattern accumulation for accountability-bearing work, where patterns must be defensibly surfaced, wrong ones must demote, and sycophancy must be structurally bounded. A high LOCOMO score tells you the agent remembered the conversation; it doesn't tell you the memory is sound at the axis that matters when it's informing decisions. anneal will run it as secondary validation when a comparison genuinely calls for it.

The full rationale, and where anneal sits against the published LOCOMO numbers → docs/architecture.md.

Session Hygiene

Session wraps are the most important thing your agent does with this system. Think of them like sleep.

Neuroscience calls it memory consolidation: during slow-wave sleep, the hippocampus replays the day's experiences while the neocortex integrates them into long-term knowledge. Skip sleep and memories degrade — experiences accumulate without being processed, patterns go unrecognized, and older knowledge doesn't get reinforced or pruned.

anneal-memory works the same way. During a session, episodes accumulate in the episodic store. At session end, the wrap compresses those episodes into the continuity file. This is where the real thinking happens — the agent recognizes patterns, promotes validated knowledge, lets stale information fade, and forms associations between related episodes. Without wraps, you just have a growing pile of raw episodes and no intelligence.

The wrap sequence:

1. prepare_wrap — gathers recent episodes, current continuity, stale pattern warnings, association context, and compression instructions

2. Agent compresses — patterns emerge during compression that weren't visible in the raw episodes

3. save_continuity — server validates structure, refuses a wrap that collapses a partnership entity's protected felt/identity layers, checks citation evidence, records associations between co-cited episodes, applies decay to unused associations, and saves the result

Rules of thumb:

• Always wrap before ending a session. An unwrapped session is like an all-nighter — the experiences happened but they weren't consolidated

• Wrap exactly once per session. save_continuity reporting demoted graduations is the immune system working, not an error — don't re-save to chase a clean report (a second save with no new prepare_wrap is refused)

• The agent-instructions snippets (MCP, CLI) handle this automatically — they teach the agent to detect session-end signals and run the full sequence

• Short sessions (3-5 episodes) still benefit from wraps. Even a small amount of compression builds the continuity file

• If prepare_wrap says "no episodes" — nothing to compress. That's fine, skip it

The graduation system and association network both depend on wraps to function. Patterns can only be promoted (1x -> 2x -> 3x) during compression, citations can only be validated during wraps, associations only form through co-citation during wraps, and stale patterns can only be detected when the agent reviews what it knows against what it recently experienced. No wraps = no immune system, no associations, no cognitive development.

MCP Tools

16 tools total (6 memory + 2 crystal + 8 spore). The crystallized tier exposes only its read surface over MCP (crystal_recall / crystal_index); crystallizing out stays a wrap-time / CLI / library action (it carries the opt-in + decision-channel governance).

Resources: anneal://continuity — the current continuity file, auto-loaded at session start. anneal://integrity/manifest — SHA-256 hashes for host-side tool description verification.

Compliance and Audit

The episodic store is a natural audit trail. Every decision, tension, and outcome is timestamped, typed, and append-only — exactly what regulators want to see when they ask "why did the AI do that?"

Hash-chained JSONL audit trail (shipped, on by default):

Every memory operation — episode recorded, episode deleted, wrap started, wrap completed, associations updated — gets logged to an append-only JSONL file where each entry's SHA-256 hash includes the previous entry's hash. Modify or delete an entry and the chain breaks. Verify integrity programmatically or with jq.

• Actor identity on every entry (who did this — agent, system, admin)

• Content-hash-only mode by default — the audit trail proves what happened without storing the content itself (GDPR-compatible: delete the episode, the audit chain still verifies)

• Weekly rotation with gzip — old audit files compress automatically, manifest index enables cross-file chain verification

• on_event callback — pipe audit events to your own systems (cloud logging, SIEM, observability)

• Crash recovery — incomplete entries detected and handled on restart

from anneal_memory import Store, AuditTrail

# Audit trail is on by default
store = Store("./memory.db", project_name="MyAgent")

# Verify chain integrity
result = AuditTrail.verify("./memory.db")
print(f"Valid: {result.valid}, Entries: {result.total_entries}")

# Stream events to external system
store = Store("./memory.db", on_audit_event=lambda entry: send_to_siem(entry))

EU AI Act relevance: The Act's Article 12 requires "automatic recording of events" for high-risk AI systems, with provisions for traceability, actor identification, and tamper evidence. This is audit infrastructure, not a compliance certification. The hash-chained trail covers the traceability requirements in Articles 12(2)(b,c) — actor identity, tamper evidence, and automatic event recording — without certifying full Act compliance.

Provenance, not just timestamps. anneal-memory ships at the provenance-chain level: every audit entry's hash is linked to its predecessor (modify or remove an entry, the chain breaks), and graduated patterns cite the episode IDs that earned them, so any pattern traces back to the observations behind it — not just when it was written. Why that distinction may become a differential compliance gate as the Act's enforcement develops, and why a memory whose quality runs through an LLM can't offer the same chain → docs/architecture.md.

What's next:

• Compliance proxy (Layer 2) — an optional transport-layer capture that extends the same hash-chained, source-tagged audit beyond memory operations, for teams that need a fuller traceability record. Off by default; the memory audit stands on its own.

• Multi-agent shared memory — shared episodic pool with per-agent continuity and per-agent association topology. Full cross-agent audit trail.

Continuity Markers

The continuity file uses a simplified marker set for density:

? question needing resolution
thought: insight worth preserving
✓ completed item

A -> B                          causation
A ><[axis] B                    tension on an axis

[decided(rationale, on)]        committed decision
[blocked(reason, since)]        external dependency

| 1x (2026-04-01)              first observation
| 2x (2026-04-01) [evidence: abc123 "explanation"]   validated pattern

Security

Memory poisoning resistance

Recent research demonstrates environment-injected memory poisoning attacks against web agents — adversarial content embedded in the environment (web pages, tool outputs) that the agent ingests as observations and that subsequently influences behavior across sessions. The published attack ("Poison Once, Exploit Forever," Zou et al., April 2026) demonstrated up to 32.5% attack success rate on GPT-4-mini against ChatGPT Atlas, Perplexity Comet, and OpenClaw — and notably did not require write access to the agent's memory store. Environmental contamination plus the agent's own consumption of the contaminated content was sufficient.

anneal-memory's citation-validated graduation does not eliminate this attack class — environment-injected episodes are recorded honestly because the agent did encounter them — but it raises the bar substantially:

1. Single-shot poisoning stalls at 1x. A poisoned episode enters the store as a raw observation. To influence the continuity file (the always-loaded compressed memory), it must graduate via independent citations from subsequent episodes. A single contaminated trajectory cannot bootstrap its own promotion.

2. Explanation-grounding check rejects ungrounded citations. The graduation pipeline runs check_explanation_overlap(explanation, episode_content) on every citation: at least two meaningful words from the citation's quoted explanation must actually appear in the cited episode's content. Citations with vague or fabricated explanations — including poisoned trajectories where an attacker controls the graduation claim text but cannot rewrite the episode body it points at — fail this check and don't accrue evidence weight. This is anti-fraud, not anti-repetition: it forces graduating claims to be textually grounded in what the episodes actually said.

3. SHA-256 audit trail provides forensic surface. While the chain doesn't prevent ingestion of contaminated environmental content, it preserves a tamper-evident record of what the agent encountered and when — supporting post-incident analysis when poisoning is detected downstream.

This is structural inference, not empirical defense. anneal-memory has not been tested against eTAMP directly. The mechanisms above derive from architectural properties — citation-validated graduation, lexical-overlap explanation-grounding, SHA-256 audit chain — not from a published evaluation. A targeted eTAMP variant could partially or fully bypass these defenses in ways the architecture-level argument doesn't anticipate. Sustained adversarial campaigns with diverse contaminated trajectories can still graduate, and the Honest scope section above documents specific gap classes (lexical-overlap exploits, rotated-pair gaming, slow-drift accumulation, contradiction-with-existing-Proven, pattern omission) confirmed reachable under adversarial-agent conditions. Architectures with no graduation gate inherit the full attack surface; anneal-memory inherits a structurally narrower one, pending direct empirical evaluation and the next set of defenses listed in Honest scope.

Tool description integrity

Tool description integrity verification detects description poisoning — where manipulated tool descriptions alter LLM behavior without changing tool functionality.

Two-layer verification:

1. Build-time manifest (tool-integrity.json) — SHA-256 hashes of all tool descriptions, shipped with the package and verified at server startup. Detects post-install modification.

2. Host-verifiable resource (anneal://integrity/manifest) — the same hashes exposed as an MCP resource, so editors and hosts can compare tool definitions received via tools/list against the server's intended definitions. Detects transport-layer description mutation between server and client — the class of attack where descriptions are modified in transit or by middleware without the server's knowledge.

anneal-memory --generate-integrity  # Regenerate after description changes
anneal-memory --skip-integrity      # Bypass for development

Lineage

anneal-memory's architecture grew from FlowScript — a typed reasoning notation that explored compression-as-cognition, temporal graduation, and citation-validated patterns. The core insights proved more powerful than the syntax; anneal-memory delivers them as a zero-dependency memory system where agents use natural language instead of learning notation. The FlowScript notation remains in active daily use for reasoning compression, and a 9-marker subset powers the continuity compression prompts.

License

MIT

Author

Phill Clapham / Clapham Digital LLC