Skip to main content
Glama
philipp-mlr

monica-mcp

by philipp-mlr

monica_reminder

Manage reminders in Monica CRM: create, list, get, update, or delete reminders with recurrence and contact associations.

Instructions

Manage reminders. Actions: list, get, create, update, delete. ⚠️ delete is irreversible.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoEntity ID (required for get/update/delete)
pageNoPage number
limitNoPage size (max 100)
titleNoReminder title
actionYesOperation to perform: list | get | create | update | delete. "list" = paginated list, "get" = by ID, "create" = new record, "update" = modify by ID, "delete" = remove by ID (irreversible).
contact_idNoContact ID
descriptionNoReminder description
frequency_typeNoFrequency type: one_time, week, month, or year
frequency_numberNoFrequency interval (for recurring reminders)
next_expected_dateNoTrigger date (YYYY-MM-DD, must be in the future)
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It warns that delete is irreversible, which is helpful, but omits other behaviors like auth needs, rate limits, or side effects of create/update.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with one sentence and a warning, front-loading the core purpose. Could be slightly more structured but effectively communicates essentials.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 10 parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks details on return values, pagination behavior, or required relationships, leaving some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides for each parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool manages reminders and lists specific actions (list, get, create, update, delete), making it distinct from sibling tools which handle different entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage through 'Manage reminders' and action list, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/philipp-mlr/monica-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server