The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: check_dependencies focuses specifically on dependency vulnerabilities via npm audit, while scan_codebase performs a comprehensive AI-powered security audit across multiple code aspects. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (check_dependencies and scan_codebase) with clear, descriptive names that accurately reflect their functions. The naming style is uniform throughout.

With only 2 tools, the server feels too thin for its apparent scope of security auditing. While the tools cover dependency scanning and codebase analysis, a security-focused server would typically benefit from more granular tools (e.g., for specific vulnerability types, remediation actions, or report generation).

The tools provide good coverage for vulnerability detection (dependencies and code), but there are notable gaps in the security lifecycle. Missing are tools for remediation (e.g., apply_fixes, update_dependencies), reporting (e.g., generate_report), or configuration management, which limits agent workflows to detection-only scenarios.