Skip to main content
Glama
phd-peter

codex-omnifocus-mcp

by phd-peter
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-omnifocus-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • omnifocus-mcp

      torsday
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives MCP-compatible AI assistants full, typed access to OmniFocus on macOS, enabling task management, project manipulation, inbox processing, and more via natural language.
      100
      50 npm
      1
      MIT

    • OmniFocus MCP Server

      mojenmojen
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered task management in OmniFocus with support for project reviews, planned dates, repeating tasks, custom perspectives, hierarchical subtasks, and advanced filtering. Perfect for Claude AI integration with comprehensive CRUD operations for tasks, projects, and folders.
      2
      -

    • MCP OmniFocus

      someposer
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables automation and management of OmniFocus tasks, projects, and tags using natural language and programmable interfaces from VS Code, command line, or any MCP-compatible client.
      12
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, with clear descriptions that guide selection (e.g., get_custom_perspective_tasks vs get_tasks_by_tag). However, the large number of retrieval tools (filter_tasks, query_omnifocus, dump_database, multiple get_*) may cause occasional confusion despite differentiating texts.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Predominantly verb_noun snake_case pattern is used (e.g., add_project, filter_tasks, list_tags). Minor inconsistencies exist: 'add_omnifocus_task' vs 'add_project' (one includes product name), 'create_tag' vs 'add_project' (different verbs), and 'edit_item'/'move_task' are slightly vague but acceptable.

    Tool Count5/5

    21 tools is well-scoped for an OmniFocus integration, covering creation, retrieval, modification, and deletion across tasks, projects, tags, and perspectives. Each tool serves a clear purpose without feeling excessive.

    Completeness3/5

    Tool surface covers most core workflows: CRUD for tasks/projects, batch operations, diverse retrieval, and attachment reading. However, tag management is incomplete – only create_tag and list_tags exist, lacking update or delete operations, which is a notable gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources