A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to read and write to OmniFocus database, allowing natural language task management, project creation, and GTD workflows.
4
1
MIT
codex-omnifocus-mcp
by phd-peter
Related Servers
Alternatives to codex-omnifocus-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to plan, capture, and organize work in OmniFocus on macOS, with tools for querying and managing tasks, projects, tags, perspectives, and session state.251MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGives MCP-compatible AI assistants full, typed access to OmniFocus on macOS, enabling task management, project manipulation, inbox processing, and more via natural language.10031 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive management of OmniFocus on macOS through 17 specialized tools for projects, tasks, and organization. Users can create, update, and filter items or navigate the interface using natural language via the Model Context Protocol.218MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI-powered task management in OmniFocus with support for project reviews, planned dates, repeating tasks, custom perspectives, hierarchical subtasks, and advanced filtering. Perfect for Claude AI integration with comprehensive CRUD operations for tasks, projects, and folders.2-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables task management in OmniFocus, including reading, creating, updating, and completing tasks, with automatic detection of Pro or Standard version.79 npmMIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 21 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes, with clear descriptions that guide selection (e.g., get_custom_perspective_tasks vs get_tasks_by_tag). However, the large number of retrieval tools (filter_tasks, query_omnifocus, dump_database, multiple get_*) may cause occasional confusion despite differentiating texts.
Naming Consistency4/5
Predominantly verb_noun snake_case pattern is used (e.g., add_project, filter_tasks, list_tags). Minor inconsistencies exist: 'add_omnifocus_task' vs 'add_project' (one includes product name), 'create_tag' vs 'add_project' (different verbs), and 'edit_item'/'move_task' are slightly vague but acceptable.
Tool Count5/5
21 tools is well-scoped for an OmniFocus integration, covering creation, retrieval, modification, and deletion across tasks, projects, tags, and perspectives. Each tool serves a clear purpose without feeling excessive.
Completeness3/5
Tool surface covers most core workflows: CRUD for tasks/projects, batch operations, diverse retrieval, and attachment reading. However, tag management is incomplete – only create_tag and list_tags exist, lacking update or delete operations, which is a notable gap.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues