trendzeist-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to trendzeist-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides free Google Trends data (interest over time, term comparison, related queries, trending now, regional breakdown) to MCP-compatible AI clients without needing an API key.5100 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides Google Search trend data as an MCP tool, with historical series, growth percentages, and live trending searches, no scraping or rate limits.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables querying Google Trends data directly from conversational MCP clients, including search interest over time, related queries and topics, regional breakdowns, and trending searches, for market research without leaving the chat.111MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to fetch Google Trends data for any term, including interest over time, interest by region, and related queries and topics, all as structured JSON.1263 npm158 PyPI5MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceProvides access to Google Trends data including status, trending questions, and trending topics via MCP tools.357 npm29MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing access to Google Trends, YouTube listings, Google Ads Transparency, and Google Play reviews via plain HTTP, with no API key required. It caches results and paces requests to work within Google's informal rate limits.72MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Most tools target distinct data sources (Trends time series, News, Wikipedia, Autocomplete, Geo). However, the discovery-oriented tools (aeo_opportunities, discover_topics, related_queries, mine_questions) all produce content angles/questions and genuinely overlap, forcing the agent to rely on descriptions to choose. Boundaries are mostly clear but not perfectly crisp.
All names use consistent snake_case, which is good. There's a mild mix between verb_noun (mine_questions, suggest_keywords, list_categories, compare_keywords) and noun_phrase (interest_over_time, related_queries, trending_now, news_coverage), but the pattern is predictable and readable throughout.
14 tools sits squarely in the well-scoped 3-15 range. Each tool maps to a distinct data source or analysis task (trends, news, wiki, autocomplete, geo, categories, status), so no tool feels redundant or padded.
The SEO/AEO research domain is well covered: trend direction, related queries/topics, questions, regional interest, categories, news, Wikipedia, and health status. Minor gaps exist (no direct cross-keyword or cross-region time comparison beyond compare_keywords/interest_by_region), but core workflows have no dead ends.