mcp-api-guardian
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-api-guardian
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI clients to validate OpenAPI specs, compare versions, detect breaking changes, and generate changelogs.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables coding agents to validate OpenAPI documents, detect breaking changes between API versions including against git refs, and validate JSON Schemas and data.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables coding agents to validate OpenAPI documents and JSON Schemas, validate data against a schema, and diff OpenAPI versions—including against a git ref—to classify breaking changes and suggest semver updates.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to analyze OpenAPI contracts for deterministic integration risks, plan auth, sync, action, and webhook candidates, and diff contract versions for likely breaking changes through read-only tools.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceValidates OpenAPI documents, JSON Schemas, and JSON payloads. Also compares OpenAPI specs and displays breaking changes.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI coding agents with accurate OpenAPI contract details to prevent hallucinated API calls, supporting multi-version pinning, endpoint discovery, and request validation.42 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
audit_openapi targets a single document (lint/auth review) while compare_openapi targets two documents (breaking-change diff), so the action and input shape differ clearly. They share the same domain and both are static analysis, so an agent could momentarily hesitate, but the descriptions disambiguate well.
Both tools follow the same verb_noun snake_case pattern (audit_openapi, compare_openapi), with the noun being the OpenAPI artifact. Fully predictable and readable.
Two tools is thin for a server presented as an API guardian; linting and diffing are the core operations but little else is exposed. It is borderline rather than mismatched, since the stated scope is narrow.
Auditing and comparing cover the main lifecycle of reviewing OpenAPI specs, with honest scope caveats in the descriptions. Gaps exist (no spec fetching/resolution, no remediation or validation-report output tooling), but agents can work around them.