Skip to main content
Glama
peterparker57

WSLSnapit-MCP

by peterparker57
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to WSLSnapit-MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Screenshot MCP Server

      peterparker57
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants running in WSL to capture Windows screenshots of full desktops, specific monitors, or individual windows by title or process name. It features DPI awareness, automatic path conversion between WSL and Windows, and customizable storage options.
      1
      3
      MIT

    • ClipToWSL MCP Server

      CarlosGtrz
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents like Claude to read Windows clipboard contents (text and images) from within WSL environments, providing seamless cross-platform clipboard access through the Model Context Protocol.
      5
      -

    • Desktop MCP

      budaesandrei
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to capture and analyze screen content across multi-monitor setups with smart image optimization. Provides screenshot capabilities and detailed monitor information for visual debugging, UI analysis, and desktop assistance.
      -

    • MCP Screenshot Server

      ai-mcp-garage
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to capture and analyze screenshots of your screen, windows, or regions with smart detection capabilities. Features natural language queries, automatic window targeting, and text enhancement for UI debugging and visual inspection.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one reads clipboard content (text or image), while the other captures screenshots. There is no overlap in functionality, making it impossible to confuse them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern: 'read_clipboard' and 'take_screenshot'. The naming is clear, predictable, and uses the same convention throughout.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a general-purpose utility server. While the tools are specific to clipboard and screenshot operations, the scope is limited, and more complementary tools (e.g., for image processing or file management) might be expected.

    Completeness3/5

    For a clipboard and screenshot utility, basic read/capture operations are covered, but there are notable gaps. For example, there is no tool to write to the clipboard, edit screenshots, or manage captured images, which could limit agent workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources