Skip to main content
Glama
pete-life

Billy MCP

by pete-life

Related Servers

Alternatives to Billy MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates Billy's accounting system with MCP, providing tools to manage invoices, contacts, products, payments, and more via natural language.
      15
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to read local Kitsas bookkeeping files, including accounts, fiscal years, partners, and vouchers, and to create purchase invoice drafts from chat or PDFs without ever writing to the ledger.
      10
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to authenticate against an internal accounting web API, list companies, categories, bank transactions and documents, upload or batch-deposit receipts (idempotent, dry-run by default), set accounting metadata, and link documents to their matching bank transactions.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading reports and accounting data, searching transactions, inspecting accounts, categories, payees, and rules, and optionally authorizing undoable bookkeeping changes through MCP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables parsing of structured receipts, invoices, and bank statements and tolerance-based three-way reconciliation that detects tax calculation drift and duplicate claims, then synthesizes balanced double-entry bookkeeping journal entries. Exposes these capabilities as MCP tools (initialize, tools/list, tools/call) over a dependency-free JSON-RPC 2.0 stdio server.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Danish accounting via Billy.dk API, enabling natural-language control over invoices, bank lines, reports, and more, with a write-guard for safety.
      65
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The toolset separates generic reads, financial reports, receipt/vendor management, and proposal/batch write workflows. Some overlap exists among the reporting tools and between refresh_plan/batch_refresh or plan/batch_get, but the descriptions are specific enough to guide selection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the billy_ prefix and snake_case, but the action pattern is inconsistent: bare verbs, noun phrases, verb_noun, and object_verb forms are mixed. This is readable but lacks a uniform verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    21 tools is on the heavy side and spans multiple subdomains such as reporting, receipts, vendors, single proposals, and batches. Each tool appears purposeful, but the count is at the borderline where agents may have trouble finding the right tool.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers status, generic reads, financial reports, receipt archival, vendor registry, single-plan lifecycle, and batch lifecycle, with a journal for recovery after unknown outcomes. Minor gaps like explicit cancellation/voiding or direct upload-to-Billy are not clearly exposed, but the proposal workflow avoids dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues