got-cosy-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to got-cosy-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA FastMCP server that exposes hospitality data — accommodations, events, and gastronomy — through a unified MCP interface, supporting multiple worlds for real or fictional data.5-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that searches hotels on Booking.com with 80+ filter options using Playwright browser automation.728 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for searching stays, comparing prices across Booking.com, Airbnb, Vrbo, and Google Hotels, and fetching reviews via natural language in AI assistants.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server providing geocoding, routing, isochrones, and POI-by-proximity search through self-hosted OpenStreetMap backends.-

RollingGo Hotel MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceOfficial RollingGo Hotel Booking MCP Server. 2M+ hotels at wholesale rates, 40+ LLM compatible. Free unlimited calls for businesses & individual devs. Filter by location, date, star grade, guests & tags; pull real-time room types, pricing & cancellation rules.85MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for agentic travel recommendations, exposing tools to retrieve member profiles and personalized travel recommendations with partner-specific rules and policies.ISC
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools serve clearly distinct purposes: one searches for hotels, the other retrieves details for a specific hotel. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tool names follow the verb_noun pattern with snake_case (find_cosy_hotels, get_hotel_feeling). The verbs 'find' and 'get' are semantically appropriate and consistent in style.
The server has only 2 tools, which is on the thin end of the scale. However, for a niche service focused on searching and retrieving hotel cosiness scores, this small count is acceptable, though it feels minimal.
The domain is covered by the core workflow: search for hotels with cosy scores, then get detailed information on a specific hotel. No obvious gaps are present, but the lack of additional query capabilities (e.g., listing all cities) is a minor limitation.