wallet_setup

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses the side effect: 'Keys saved to ~/.bridgekitty/.env'. No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. Could be more explicit about overwrite behavior or idempotency, but the hint to check wallet_status mitigates.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with front-loaded action. Every sentence adds value: first states purpose, second adds behavioral context and usage guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Provides prerequisite (check wallet_status) and side effect (file save). For a setup tool with no parameters and no output schema, it covers key aspects. Lacks idempotency detail but is fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has zero parameters, so description does not need to add param info. The baseline for 0 params is 4, and the description covers the tool's operation without needing parameter details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the specific resource 'wallets for all supported chains (EVM, Cosmos, Solana)'. It distinguishes the tool from sibling tools like wallet_status and wallet_import by specifying the scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to 'Use wallet_status first to check if already configured', providing clear when-to-use context and directing to a sibling tool for pre-conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.