signs-of-ai
Related Servers
Alternatives to signs-of-ai
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides local, deterministic scoring and detailed auditing of text for AI-writing patterns via two read-only tools, with no network calls or language models.22 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA private, open-source AI-text checker. Get a read on whether text looks AI-written, the exact AI-tell spans to fix, a reuse check, and a grammar pass.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables multi-tier AI-detection screening on academic papers by extracting text from .tex and .docx files, splitting into standard sections, and running a pipeline of statistical and LLM-based analysis.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAnalyzes text and files for formulaic AI writing patterns, returning a 0-100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete revision advice. Runs entirely locally with rule-based heuristics, requiring no LLM judge or API calls.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceai-detect is a free AI text detector that runs entirely on your own hardware. It scores writing sentence by sentence using desklib/ai-text-detector-v1.01, a 304-million-parameter DeBERTa-v3-large model that ranks first on the RAID detection benchmark. No API key, no per-word pricing and no upload: after a one-off 1.7 GB model download it just works offline. by Houtini10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents and users to analyze text or files for formulaic AI writing patterns and receive a 0–100 score, band label, violations with surrounding context, and concrete advice. It works programmatically without LLM judges or API calls.-
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct analysis vector—stylometry, perplexity, hidden characters, citation consistency, exact copying, paraphrased copying, authorship baseline, and report generation—so most are easy to distinguish. The main ambiguity is between check_originality and check_paraphrase, and secondarily among analyze_ai_writing, measure_predictability, and write_report as related ways of assessing AI-like writing.
All tool names follow a consistent imperative verb + object pattern in snake_case, such as search_catalog, check_citations, and write_report. The only minor deviation is compare_to_baseline with its preposition, but it still fits the overall pattern clearly.
Ten tools cover a broad but coherent scope for an AI-writing analysis server: core analysis, predictability, authorship baseline, plagiarism and paraphrase checks, character inspection, citation validation, a reference catalog, and report generation. Each tool earns its place and none feel redundant.
The tool surface covers the full workflow of a document review for AI-writing signs: analyze stylistic signals, measure predictability, check for copying and paraphrasing, inspect hidden characters, validate citations, extract distinctive phrases for further checking, and produce a final report. Live web search and whole-internet plagiarism indexing are explicitly out of scope by design.