Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to signs-of-ai

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides local, deterministic scoring and detailed auditing of text for AI-writing patterns via two read-only tools, with no network calls or language models.
      2
      2 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables multi-tier AI-detection screening on academic papers by extracting text from .tex and .docx files, splitting into standard sections, and running a pipeline of statistical and LLM-based analysis.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Analyzes text and files for formulaic AI writing patterns, returning a 0-100 score, band label, specific violations with context, and concrete revision advice. Runs entirely locally with rule-based heuristics, requiring no LLM judge or API calls.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      ai-detect is a free AI text detector that runs entirely on your own hardware. It scores writing sentence by sentence using desklib/ai-text-detector-v1.01, a 304-million-parameter DeBERTa-v3-large model that ranks first on the RAID detection benchmark. No API key, no per-word pricing and no upload: after a one-off 1.7 GB model download it just works offline. by Houtini
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents and users to analyze text or files for formulaic AI writing patterns and receive a 0–100 score, band label, violations with surrounding context, and concrete advice. It works programmatically without LLM judges or API calls.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct analysis vector—stylometry, perplexity, hidden characters, citation consistency, exact copying, paraphrased copying, authorship baseline, and report generation—so most are easy to distinguish. The main ambiguity is between check_originality and check_paraphrase, and secondarily among analyze_ai_writing, measure_predictability, and write_report as related ways of assessing AI-like writing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent imperative verb + object pattern in snake_case, such as search_catalog, check_citations, and write_report. The only minor deviation is compare_to_baseline with its preposition, but it still fits the overall pattern clearly.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools cover a broad but coherent scope for an AI-writing analysis server: core analysis, predictability, authorship baseline, plagiarism and paraphrase checks, character inspection, citation validation, a reference catalog, and report generation. Each tool earns its place and none feel redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full workflow of a document review for AI-writing signs: analyze stylistic signals, measure predictability, check for copying and paraphrasing, inspect hidden characters, validate citations, extract distinctive phrases for further checking, and produce a final report. Live web search and whole-internet plagiarism indexing are explicitly out of scope by design.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessWithin a week