list_branches
List all story branches and plot drafts to compare versions and maintain narrative consistency.
Instructions
[branch] 全ブランチ(物語の版/プロット案)を列挙する。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all story branches and plot drafts to compare versions and maintain narrative consistency.
[branch] 全ブランチ(物語の版/プロット案)を列挙する。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description is consistent with the readOnlyHint annotation, but it does not add any behavioral context beyond what the annotation already provides. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-formed sentence that is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words. Every part is informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has no parameters, a read-only annotation, and is a simple list operation, the description is sufficiently complete. It lacks details about the return format but that is minor.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter details. The baseline for 0 parameters is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'all branches', and distinguishes from sibling tools like create_branch, delete_branch, merge_branches. It specifies the scope and context of the tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description is minimal and does not provide explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. However, for a simple listing tool, the purpose is clear enough that usage context is implied.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/penta2himajin/noveletary'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server