ru-docs-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ru-docs-mcp
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRussian business data with no API key: company check by INN/OGRN in FNS EGRUL/EGRIP, Bank of Russia exchange rates and key rate, late-payment interest, production calendar with business-day math, and bank details by BIK.10MIT
Related Servers

Dokmatiq DocGenofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenancePDF/DOCX/Excel generation from HTML/Markdown with stationery overlay, ZUGFeRD/XRechnung e-invoicing, digital signing, form filling, and AI receipt OCR with DATEV/SKR03 export.40MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to synthesize print-ready vector PDFs and high-resolution PNG previews for invoices, estimates, receipts, contracts, and other business documents, with configurable themes, compliance notices, and verification seals.MIT

DocuQueue MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables creating professional documents (invoices, contracts, certificates, proposals, reports) via the DocuQueue API, with tools for template management, filling, previewing, and PDF generation.70 npm1MIT
rechnungsapi-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and agents to create, validate, read and convert German and EU e-invoices in ZUGFeRD, XRechnung and Factur-X formats, including extracting structured data from scanned or PDF invoices and embedding XML into PDF/A-3 files. It can run as a hosted remote server or locally, with each request authenticated by the caller's own API token.1016 npmMIT- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and Cursor to work with Kontur.Elba through its public API: finding or creating clients, issuing invoices, acts, and UPDs, obtaining public document links, and tracking payments. It also keeps a local invoice journal with duplicate protection and provides prompt-driven scenarios for invoicing, closing work, and reminding debtors.19MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceFree Polish VAT invoice generation MCP server with PDF output and preview. No API key required.117 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct artifact: act_create (acts), invoice_create (invoices), payment_qr (standalone QR), amount_in_words (number-to-text). The invoice_create vs payment_qr overlap (both produce QR) is explicitly disambiguated in their descriptions, though amount_in_words partially duplicates functionality already embedded in the other two.
act_create and invoice_create follow a noun_verb (object_action) pattern, while amount_in_words and payment_qr are bare noun phrases. The convention is mixed but each name remains readable and self-explanatory.
Four focused tools for a Russian business-document generator is well-scoped and each earns its place. It is slightly thin, but nothing is redundant or bloated.
Core workflow of invoice/act/QR generation plus amount-in-words is covered, and descriptions reference related documents (contracts, receipts). Minor gaps such as contract or other standard forms (UPD/TORG-12) exist but agents can work around them.