Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ru-docs-mcp

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Russian business data with no API key: company check by INN/OGRN in FNS EGRUL/EGRIP, Bank of Russia exchange rates and key rate, late-payment interest, production calendar with business-day math, and bank details by BIK.
    10
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to synthesize print-ready vector PDFs and high-resolution PNG previews for invoices, estimates, receipts, contracts, and other business documents, with configurable themes, compliance notices, and verification seals.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables creating professional documents (invoices, contracts, certificates, proposals, reports) via the DocuQueue API, with tools for template management, filling, previewing, and PDF generation.
    70 npm
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants and agents to create, validate, read and convert German and EU e-invoices in ZUGFeRD, XRechnung and Factur-X formats, including extracting structured data from scanned or PDF invoices and embedding XML into PDF/A-3 files. It can run as a hosted remote server or locally, with each request authenticated by the caller's own API token.
    10
    16 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and Cursor to work with Kontur.Elba through its public API: finding or creating clients, issuing invoices, acts, and UPDs, obtaining public document links, and tracking payments. It also keeps a local invoice journal with duplicate protection and provides prompt-driven scenarios for invoicing, closing work, and reminding debtors.
    19
    MIT

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a distinct artifact: act_create (acts), invoice_create (invoices), payment_qr (standalone QR), amount_in_words (number-to-text). The invoice_create vs payment_qr overlap (both produce QR) is explicitly disambiguated in their descriptions, though amount_in_words partially duplicates functionality already embedded in the other two.

Naming Consistency3/5

act_create and invoice_create follow a noun_verb (object_action) pattern, while amount_in_words and payment_qr are bare noun phrases. The convention is mixed but each name remains readable and self-explanatory.

Tool Count4/5

Four focused tools for a Russian business-document generator is well-scoped and each earns its place. It is slightly thin, but nothing is redundant or bloated.

Completeness4/5

Core workflow of invoice/act/QR generation plus amount-in-words is covered, and descriptions reference related documents (contracts, receipts). Minor gaps such as contract or other standard forms (UPD/TORG-12) exist but agents can work around them.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues