positions
Get a list of all open positions in your Interactive Brokers account. Review current holdings to manage your portfolio.
Instructions
Open positions in the account.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Get a list of all open positions in your Interactive Brokers account. Review current holdings to manage your portfolio.
Open positions in the account.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits like read-only nature, data freshness, or authentication requirements. The minimal description fails to provide such context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with one sentence, but it could be more informative without being wordy. It is front-loaded and avoids redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the output format or how it differs from similar tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no value beyond the schema, earning a baseline score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Open positions in the account' clearly indicates the tool retrieves open positions, but it is vague and does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'portfolio' which may also list positions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'portfolio', 'account_summary', or 'close_position'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/pedrobraiti/agentic-trading-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server