Skip to main content
Glama
peculiar-systems

InvoiceIn

Official
by peculiar-systems
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to InvoiceIn

  • InvoiceXML by InvoiceXML

    InvoiceXMLofficial

    InvoiceXML
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    InvoiceXML brings e-invoice compliance to your AI agent. Create, validate, convert, render, and extract structured invoices across UBL (Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, used worldwide), CII, Factur-X, ZUGFeRD, and XRechnung, all checked against the EN 16931 standard and official Schematron rules. Ask your assistant to generate a compliant invoice, validate one for errors, or convert between formats, with n
    5
    MIT

  • eleata e-invoice MCP server

    eleata
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Validates EU electronic invoices (Peppol, XRechnung, FatturaPA, etc.) and explains validation error codes, enabling AI coding agents to check invoice validity and get fixes before rejection.
    3
    33 npm
    MIT
  • beliq-mcp by beliq-eu

    beliq-mcpofficial

    beliq-eu
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Validates electronic invoices (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD, Factur-X, Peppol BIS, etc.) against authority-pinned rules and explains failures.
    2
    165 npm
    MIT

  • Kontor MCP

    DashankaNadeeshanDeSilva
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to locally parse, validate, audit, explain, generate, and convert XRechnung and ZUGFeRD/Factur-X e-invoices using official rule sets, fully offline with no API keys required.
    Apache 2.0

Related Servers

  • invoicehub-mcp

    einvoice-dev1
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    EU e-invoice validation, as a developer API. Check whether an electronic invoice conforms to EN 16931 — the European standard behind France, Germany, Belgium, Poland and the 2030 ViDA mandate — with a single REST call. Structured JSON errors mapped to the official BR-* business rules. No enterprise sales call required.
    MIT

  • facturolia-mcp

    toomasgutman-blip
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Read and check European e-invoices (Factur-X, ZUGFeRD, XRechnung, UBL, CII) from an AI assistant: contents in plain text plus an EN 16931 consistency check.
    2
    MIT
  • rechnungsapi-mcp by Rechnungsapi

    rechnungsapi-mcpofficial

    Rechnungsapi
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants and agents to create, validate, read and convert German and EU e-invoices in ZUGFeRD, XRechnung and Factur-X formats, including extracting structured data from scanned or PDF invoices and embedding XML into PDF/A-3 files. It can run as a hosted remote server or locally, with each request authenticated by the caller's own API token.
    10
    28 npm
    MIT

  • einvoice-mcp

    makririch
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server for DACH e-invoicing. Create XRechnung (UBL) and ZUGFeRD 2.3 (Factur-X CII) invoices, validate against EN 16931 rules, extract data from XML, and convert between UBL, CII and JSON formats.
    6
    49 npm
    2
    MIT

  • Invoice Bridge MCP

    Winterholdt
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to locate invoice files, extract embedded ZUGFeRD/Factur-X XML from PDF/A-3 documents, and validate compliance with § 14 UStG and EN 16931, including direct PDF invoice checks.
    1
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose (HTML rendering, JSON parsing, validation, CSV export, DATEV export). However, read_invoice and validate_invoice both involve validation and could be confused from names alone, though descriptions clarify the difference.

Naming Consistency2/5

The naming pattern is inconsistent: three tools use noun_to_format (invoice_to_html, invoice_to_csv, invoice_to_datev) while two use verb_noun (read_invoice, validate_invoice). This mixed convention makes the tool names less predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Five tools is a well-scoped set for the stated domain of European e-invoice processing, covering the main output formats and validation needs without unnecessary bloat.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: reading, validating, and converting to HTML, CSV, and DATEV. No significant gaps are apparent for the domain, especially since HTML can be used for PDF rendering.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources