Skip to main content
Glama
peakacom

peaka-mcp-server

Official
by peakacom

Related Servers

Alternatives to peaka-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to query and explore schemas in Microsoft Fabric lakehouses, warehouses, and SQL databases using natural language, with tools for executing read-only SQL queries and searching tables, columns, and query patterns.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives an LLM read-only, schema-aware SQL database access so users can ask business questions in plain English and receive the exact result set, with malformed queries returned as errors for automatic retry and correction.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to execute SQL queries and explore Snowflake databases using natural language, with schema discovery, table inspection, and readonly mode.
      11
      687 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 32 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (caches, queries, metadata, connections, semantic tables) and the descriptions clearly separate them. The main ambiguities are peaka_execute_sql_query vs peaka_execute_query (raw SQL vs saved query by ID) and peaka_query_golden_sqls, which sounds like execution but is actually retrieval. Granular discovery tools overlap somewhat with peaka_get_project_metadata, but descriptions clarify their scoped roles.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the peaka_ prefix and consistently use snake_case verb_noun naming, which is predictable. Minor inconsistencies exist: plural status tools use get_ (get_cache_statuses, get_materialized_query_statuses) instead of list_, and query is used as a verb in peaka_query_golden_sqls. Overall the create/update/delete/refresh/list/get conventions are followed well.

    Tool Count2/5

    32 tools is heavy for an MCP server, falling in the too-many range. The set spans several subdomains, but many granular metadata tools (list_catalogs, list_schemas, list_tables, list_columns, plus get_project_metadata) could be consolidated. Even though each tool has a purpose, the overall surface feels bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are well covered: saved queries have full CRUD plus execution and refresh, caches have create/update/delete/refresh/status, and metadata discovery is thorough. The main gaps are in the semantic layer—no delete_semantic_catalog or update_semantic_table—and connections are read-only. These are workable gaps rather than fatal dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues