Brazilian Law Research MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Brazilian Law Research MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for accessing 36 Brazilian public data sources and 1 agent, enabling AI agents to query government data on economy, legislation, transparency, judiciary, elections, environment, health, and more.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA RAG-based MCP server for natural language querying of Brazilian healthcare manuals (SIH/SUS, SIA/SUS) and official ordinances. It provides 16 tools for semantic search, regulatory critique analysis, and retrieving data from SIGTAP and CNES.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that connects AI agents to 28 Brazilian public APIs, providing tools to query government data on economy, legislation, transparency, judiciary, elections, environment, health, and more.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying case lists from the TJSP court (eproc) via official sources. It provides one read-only tool to consult court cases through natural language in any MCP-compatible client.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for token-efficient access to Open Finance Brasil rules, enabling coding agents to search and retrieve specific regulations, OpenAPI specs, and business rules through progressive disclosure.431 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables querying 34,138 legislative acts of the State of Rio de Janeiro from ALERJ and the Official Diary, with six MCP tools. Its central tool verifies legal validity at both act and device levels, explicitly distinguishing declared source status from inferred information.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct Brazilian superior court (STF, STJ, TST) with clear, non-overlapping purposes. The descriptions include specific court responsibilities, making it unambiguous which tool to use for each court.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern: acronym of the court plus 'LegalPrecedentsRequest' (e.g., StfLegalPrecedentsRequest). The naming is predictable and uniform, aiding agent selection.
Three tools is appropriate for querying legal precedents from three specific superior courts. The scope is narrow and well-defined, with no unnecessary tools.
The server covers the three main superior courts (STF, STJ, TST), which are essential for Brazilian law research. Minor missing courts (e.g., TSE, STM) could be considered gaps, but for a focused research tool, the coverage is adequate.