Skip to main content
Glama
pdfgate

PDFGate MCP Server

Official
by pdfgate

Related Servers

Alternatives to PDFGate MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform PDF operations like merge, split, compress, convert, encrypt, OCR, and summarize using natural language.
      98
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform a wide range of PDF processing tasks, including conversion, editing, merging, splitting, OCR, barcode/QR code generation and reading, AI-powered data extraction, and image processing, through the PDF4me API.
      92
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents tools to read PDFs, list form fields, apply operations, highlight, add notes, fill fields, place signatures, list signatures, and flatten PDFs.
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to generate PDFs from templates using the PDFMonkey API, including managing templates, documents, and Liquid snippets, and checking workspace and quota details.
      11
      18 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct action-object pair, from PDF manipulation (flatten, compress, protect, watermark) to lifecycle operations for envelopes and recipients. Even similar operations like upload_file vs generate_pdf are clearly differentiated by their descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 24 tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., list_recipients, create_envelope, download_file). No mixed conventions or vague generic verbs appear.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 24 tools, the server falls into the heavy range (16-25). The breadth is justified by covering PDF manipulation, document storage, e-signature envelopes, recipients, and webhooks, but the count is still borderline and could feel overwhelming for agents.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface lacks list operations for documents and envelopes (e.g., list_documents, list_envelopes), forcing agents to rely on previously known IDs. There is also no delete_recipient or update_webhook, leaving notable lifecycle gaps that can hinder discovery and management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues