Skip to main content
Glama
pc-style

MCP Goose Subagents Server

by pc-style

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Goose Subagents Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This local MCP server lets a primary AI assistant delegate tasks in parallel to specialized sub-agent CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, Cursor) that share the same project context, then aggregates and synthesizes their findings into one response. It uses existing CLI tools and API subscriptions with no markup, supporting 26+ MCP-compatible IDEs.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets a primary AI assistant delegate parts of a prompt to specialized sub-agent CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, Cursor), which run in parallel against a shared context bundle. It then aggregates their findings into a single synthesized response, using existing CLI tools and subscriptions with no extra cost.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that turns independent AI agents into a coordinated engineering team with shared task board, context, review loop, and enforced plan-implement-review-iterate workflow.
      24
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for coordinating multiple AI agents across developers and vendors with a shared job board, per-file locking, and live project context.
      396 npm
      7
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: create_goose_recipe handles recipe creation, delegate_to_subagents initiates task delegation, get_subagent_results retrieves results, and list_active_subagents monitors subagent status. The descriptions clearly differentiate their functions, making misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (create_goose_recipe, delegate_to_subagents, get_subagent_results, list_active_subagents) with snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for managing subagents, covering creation, delegation, result retrieval, and status listing. It is slightly lean but well-scoped for the apparent purpose, though additional tools for updating or deleting recipes might be expected in a more comprehensive set.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core workflows: creating recipes, delegating tasks, getting results, and monitoring status. Minor gaps exist, such as no tools for updating or deleting recipes, and no direct control over subagents (e.g., stopping them), but agents can likely work around these with the provided operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues